• Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just as managers and owners agreed to the compromise of unions in order to prevent the workers from dragging them from their homes and setting the factory on fire with them inside, governments should feel the fear of what happens when you treat people like shit and ignore their complaints.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      A lot of people died to get the pittances we got from the ownership class. Decades of

      • labor: we want to paid in real money, and work less than 12 hours a day 6 days a week
      • owner: no
      • labor: then we’re going on strike
      • owner, to the state: HELP
      • the state: sends police and troops to do violence to labor

      The idea that peacefully asking for stuff on its own is effective is largely ahistorical. A happy myth sold by the people who would be receiving violence.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ya know…everyone always tries to say violence isn’t the answer. It’s things like this that tells me those people are stupid. Violence is absolutely the answer.

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Remember that the j6 rioters got everything they thought they wanted, and they got a pardon.

    • AreaKode@riskeratspizza.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are better answers. But the last 18 months have taught me that there is no way in hell the billionaire class will ever give up any of their wealth. Even when it in everyone’s best interest.

      If they won’t play nice, don’t expect the response to be nice either. Violence still isn’t necessary, but they should be afraid!

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Violence still isn’t necessary

        I disagree. Show me a time in history where a population is being oppressed, and then that stopped without violence.

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Disruption and obstruction can force concessions without explicit violence.

          The Montgomery Bus Boycott achieved its goal without it by demonstrating the economic significance of black passengers. The Nashville Sit-ins won through the resilience of its participants without fighting back. The message in each case was “We’re going to continue being a problem until we get what we want.” The Civil Rights Movement in general achieved a lot of victories simply by being a persistent, well-coordinated nuisance.

          Their discipline in staying non-violent even in the face or cruel injustice was a psychological weapon, which can win battles without firing bullets. It drew attention to that injustice, dominated news cycles until people could no longer look away. If media thrive on outrage, police violence is more effective than police suppressing terrorists.

          The mistake that people make is to conflate peaceful, “polite”, lawful protest with non-violence: Protests need to be a problem. I can ignore people chanting whatever in the streets, but I can’t ignore them disrupting businesses and obstructing public places. I can try suppressing them with violence, but what if that doesn’t work, if they keep coming?

          There’s a book on the topic, “Waging a good war” by Thomas E. Ricks that I found quite enlightening. The important takeaway is that there are multiple ways to win a war, and defeating the opposition’s will can work without actual violence, but the key part is still a military level of discipline and planning.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Violence is the last resort, but that’s where the billionaire dickheads are taking us.

    • Donn@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      the difference between violence as an act of aggression/dominance/establishing hierarchy, versus an equalizing force to regain autonomy/dismantle said hierarchy

    • Cherry@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I always see it like a game of tug of way. With 2 sides. there needs to be tension. If there is no pull at one of the sides then the other side just pull all the rope. These situations need a level of tension.

  • randompasta@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wonder how many government officials, local and state, have been paid off to ignore public input, know they aren’t getting reelected, but don’t care because they’ve gotten enough to retire.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my county they changed tune on data centers 6 months before running for re-election and won re-election. People have short memories or never knew to begin with.

  • AviAdi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only government that works for the people is a government that is afraid of the people

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Violence can be an effective strategy.

      Let them cool data centers with the tears of the Martin Luther King Jr that white supremacists invented.

  • SnoringEarthworm@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Speak softly (peacefully protest) and carry a big stick (riot).

    Martin Luther King and Malcolm X.

    You need both.