• sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Either way, OP is correct. The linked article talks about power capacity, not energy produced. This jackass decided to come in and call another website a “Wikipedia source,” misquote a completely different and irrelevant energy stat by 4 orders of magnitude, using a power unit, and bring some kind of attitude with it.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      This jackass decided to come in and call another website a “Wikipedia source,”

      Think about this for literally five seconds you fucking moron.

      Does wikipedia link to itself as a source?

      What do you think the word ‘source’ means?