• Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    US Tech leadership in the World is already a running Gag in China since time.

    • myyass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There’s very little useful tech in the US; every time I see what other countries are doing and having traveled to some. We’re living in the dark ages.

      I can’t think of anything other than enshitification being the largest advancements in the US.

  • folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This news is a year old.
    China very likely surpassed 1,250 GW at this moment.

  • Slashme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    We have a system of units based on factors of 1000. Why on earth wouldn’t one say “surpass 1 TW”? If they want important sounding numbers, they could say “a million megawatts”.

    • weps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      sometimes things become standard I guess

      like driving 1000 kilometers for a trip or weighing 100 kilograms

      using 1000 kWh in your house

      • Slashme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Much as I’d like Mm and Mg to be more widely used, they’re very rarely seen. TW and MWh are perfectly normal units, though.

        I do find it sad that people talk about 1000 kilotons, though. It’s a Tg. A ton is a megagram, a kiloton is a gigagram, and a thousand of those is a teragram. It’s a pity that we don’t live in a world where that’s normal.

  • wheezy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    826.5x the power needed to time travel in a Delorean. That’s a lot of GW.

  • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    According to this wikipedia source, the entire species generated 18TW in 2019

    A lightning strike is around a terawatt.

    • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You’re mixing up units, and I’m not sure what you’re saying.

      Watts are a unit of power. Watt hours are a unit of energy.

      The link you gave, which is not Wikipedia, describes 180,000 TWh of energy used in 2025, 2,811 TWh of which came from solar.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Did I say it was a wikpedia link, or did I say it was a wikipedia source?

        Does the OP link say GW or GWh?

        Fuck off. You’re a failure of a pedant.

        • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Oh, I was gently warning you that you were unintentionally wrong. OP’s link is about power, and your link is about energy, and you’ve somehow managed to completely misread it.

          But if you’re gonna dig in your heels, then sure. Continue being wrong. Being a dick about it won’t make others take you seriously.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            18 hours ago

            You literally wrote the wrong unit. What a loathsome fucking wretch you are. Stupid, antagonistic, smarmy. This place is more reddit every day.

            • elixir_fan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              You’re thinking of OP (or the original article’s title), the person you’ve been talking to here is someone else

              • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Either way, OP is correct. The linked article talks about power capacity, not energy produced. This jackass decided to come in and call another website a “Wikipedia source,” misquote a completely different and irrelevant energy stat by 4 orders of magnitude, using a power unit, and bring some kind of attitude with it.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          did I say it was a wikipedia source?

          What a stupid thing to get upset about. Just cite the source, why did you bring Wikipedia into it if you’re not gonna reference what it was cited for there…

          If you find an article on Google, do you call it a Google source?

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They have truckloads of minerals they can use, vast amounts of empty space to place solar panel parks, and very good reasons to go self-sufficient to the point the government is subsidizing the push, so it makes sense they could reach that goal so fast.