• DaleGribble88@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      On the flip side, I am genuinely curious how much storage and processing time all the AI slop being uploaded is costing them. Some of that stuff is hours long, and like most videos on YouTube, most people aren’t watching it.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why do so many people abbreviate adverts/advertisements to “adds”… where is the extra d coming from ?

      • andz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m with you there. When I see “adds”, I want to know where they’re coming from and who’s going to tank them.

        Ads, on the other hand, those I’m content with knowing my adblocker is taking care of it.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    I had a video of a newsworthy event a while back that went viral, and I made over 5 grand on it over the course of about 2-3 years when YouTube changed its monetization policy to require like 10k subscribers or something before the creator could monetize.

    The video didn’t stop getting views. It had a spike in views just a few weeks ago when something similar happened in the same area. But I haven’t made any money from it in like 8 years.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I know nothing about how YT works. How is 20 million shorts views in 90 days a viable number? That seems ridiculous.

    I guess they’ll keep pushing it till the line starts going down.

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    And they will continue to bleed talent for every ounce of value they can, just like the record industry, the movie and tv industry, the book industry, the video game industry, enshitification is an emergent property of a degree of value extraction.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    For a second, I thought this required creators to watch 8000 hours of videos, and felt relief.

    It would at least throw up an obstacle for bot/spam accounts. They’d have to make the effort of watching a bunch of videos.

    …But no.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    You can make money on YouTube without having a monetized account. But you can also make money on PeerTube in exactly the same way.

  • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Google removes ways of blocking ads> Google owns YouTube>YouTube makes new requirements to have monetization for creator content> YouTube has a ton of corporate sponsors that have a tie into creator content> No longer fun and easy to make money making videos due to advertisements.

  • mangobanana@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Jesus who watches this much yt? The only thing I watch are a couple of how to videos a month. It boggles my mind that people watch so much pure crap.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Then they removed their ads from all channels below 8,000 hours, right?.. Right?!

  • rottenmummy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Reminds me of that woman who made science videos on both YouTube and Pornhub and she makes more money on Pornhub.

    • evidences@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      8 days ago

      If I’m remembering correctly it was more money per view on pornhub but she had significantly more views on YouTube so the total amount per platform was still significantly in YouTube favor.

      Still wild that a porn site theoretically pays better than Google.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        idk, pornhub brings google into your porn habits, I don’t want to deal with google at all.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      That is actually interesting to know. Makes a person wonder what is the demographic watching the videos and why.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The end result is that channels will just post twice as much slop to get to those hours

      Slop doesn’t get return viewers, which is counter-productive to reaching a watch hours (or subscribers) threshold.

  • MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    8 days ago

    I used to display Google ad links on my site, they accumulated value - slowly, but Google would only cut a check when you reach $100 worth of ads shown. My earnings approached $100 like an asymptote, halfway there in the first 6 months, 3/4 in the first year, 7/8 in the second year, 15/16 in the third… never did quite reach $100, and so my payout for all my effort and showing of their ads remains to this day $0.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        And when you have “proof” they fudged their numbers, how exactly do you make the monster pay? It’s definitely a rigged game.

  • Akasazh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 days ago

    And they will never stop extracting more value. I just want to prop nebula here, it’s great for creators and there’s a lot of them already on there.

    The only thing ‘missing’ is the commenting system, but to me that’s an upgrade.

    • jnod4@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 days ago

      Comm Systems is essential for the community pointing out mistakes or wrong doings

    • verifiedbyme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      Nebula is awesome. I took a gamble with them and bought lifetime during their second round two years ago and never regretted it. It has only been getting better, here’s to hope that they keep direction.

    • nightlily@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      And if you want comedy, Dropout (formerly College Humor) is a great service that openly encourages you sharing your account with your friends.

      • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        The only streaming platform I sub to is Dropout and I happily do it. I believe I stumbled upon Breaking News first, watched first season or so on the high seas. I was in tears from laughing and I’ve been subbed ever since. Great value for the money, imo.