Also /c/modabuse. Also /c/yepowertrippinbastards. Also lemmy.ml/c/worldnews, comrade, ACAB, and 552 individual accounts across 67 instances, about half of them on lemmy.world.

None of this is in the source code. It’s downloaded at runtime from a file nobody has ever looked at.

If you’re just tuning in

Tesseract is a third-party web frontend for Lemmy, maintained by asimons04 and licensed AGPL-3.0. Admins deploy it on their own servers alongside or instead of lemmy-ui, and there are public instances of it people use to browse Lemmy generally. If you’ve used a Lemmy site that didn’t look like stock Lemmy, there’s a fair chance it was this.

Last week db0 posted a PSA: Tesseract contains a blacklist of instance domains compiled directly into the application. 32 of them. Admins can’t see it, can’t configure it, and aren’t told it’s there. Connect to a listed instance and the app tells you it’s “incompatible,” which is not true.

I went through the code to see how that was implemented. The hardcoded list turns out to be the small half of the system.

There’s a second filter policy fetched over HTTP every time the app loads. It isn’t in the git repository. It’s unauthenticated and world-readable, so anyone can pull it. Right now it carries 552 user accounts, 2,275 username patterns, 54 instances, 97 communities, 289 keyword patterns and 351 domains, with every category set to hide matches rather than flag them. Not collapsed behind a click. Simply absent, with no indication anything was removed.

Verify all of it in ten seconds

curl -s https://tesseract.dubvee.org/tesseract/api/system/policy \
  | base64 -d | gunzip > policy.json

That’s the live policy, base64-wrapped gzip, 111KB of JSON when it unpacks. There’s a stale fallback copy at /data/policy.dat as well.

It filters criticism of moderators

  • lemmy.sdf.org/c/modabuse — listed
  • lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/yepowertrippinbastards — listed
  • lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/YPTBcirclejerk — listed
  • community regex power ?tripping?
  • keyword censoring me

Call the rest of it whatever you like. This part is not spam defence.

It filters words

The 32 community name patterns include Communis(t|m), Conservativ(e|es|ism), Leftis(t|m), Libertarian(ism)?, ^Green Part(y|ies), Zionis(t|m), (Police|Cops), guillotine and billionaire.

Keywords include comrade, ACAB, neoliberal, proletaria(n|t) and death to.

Filtered communities on instances that aren’t blocked: lemmy.ml/c/worldnews, lemmy.today/c/news, lemmy.ca/c/politicalnewscanada, lemmy.ca/c/usa, infosec.pub/c/strategic_unions.

The 552 users aren’t bots

67 instances. 272 on lemmy.world alone, 40 on sh.itjust.works, 19 on lemmy.ca, and 28 instances contributing exactly one person each.

355 of the 552 usernames are plain alphabetic, twelve characters or under, median length eight. Only 36 look like spam registrations. A bot list looks like the opposite of that.

Seven of them aren’t even Lemmy. There are Mastodon and Friendica accounts in there: people who have never used Lemmy, hidden by a Lemmy frontend, with no possible way of finding out.

I have the list and I’m not posting it. Most of these are ordinary people who got pattern-matched, and 552 names on this comm is a harassment target inside an hour. Run the command above and grep for yourself.

And it lies about it

When the instance block fires you get: “Incompatible Instance. Not Supported. $instance is not compatible with Tesseract.”

Nothing is incompatible. It’s a policy decision dressed as an API error, and it’s what had db0 chasing a version mismatch that never existed.

For the hidden users, communities and keywords, you get no message at all.

Admins can’t switch it off

Tesseract has env vars for PUBLIC_DOMAIN_BLACKLIST, PUBLIC_FAKE_NEWS_BLACKLIST and the shortener lists. There is none for either blocklist. enableToxicMode bypasses the other filters and explicitly not this one.

Self-host it and you cannot disable this, nothing in your config admits it exists, and the contents can change without you pulling a commit.

Before someone says it

A lot of that domain list is real spam defence. It filters conservatism as well as communism. “It targets the left” doesn’t survive the data and I’m not going to pretend it does.

The problem is that spam filtering and political editorial got welded into one undocumented, remotely-updatable blob, shipped hidden, to admins who’ve never read it and users who don’t know it’s there. The spam work is what makes the rest unauditable: “it’s a spam list” answers every individual question and none of the whole.

And /c/modabuse is not spam.

Asks

  1. Publish the runtime policy in the repo, or kill the endpoint.
  2. Stop reporting a policy block as a technical incompatibility.
  3. Tell users when something’s been hidden. One line.
  4. Give operators an off switch, like every other blacklist in the codebase has.

It’s AGPL-3.0 and db0 already forked it. That’s the licence working as designed. But forking isn’t disclosure, and the admins who need this are precisely the ones with no reason to go looking.

If you run Tesseract, you are relaying a 111KB moderation policy you have never read, under your instance’s name, to users who don’t know it exists.

Full contents of every list, unedited, in the comments.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As of around 7 hours ago, there’s a closed issue on the repo’s tracker from someone upset they were on the secret list, and the maintainer closed the issue stating that they’d make an official statement once everyone cooled off. Also that the issue tracker wasn’t the right place for that discussion.

    This indicates that they are aware of the threads about this stuff here on Lemmy.

    Please don’t dogpile the issue tracker, and give an opportunity for cooler heads to prevail. Trust that if they’re a piece of shit it won’t take long for them to confirm it (again) loud and clear. Not saying this isn’t a whole big bunch of bullshit, just that they should at least get a small opportunity to respond with their side.

    If you hand someone a shovel and they use it to dig their hole deeper instead of filling it in, it’s even more fun to watch them fall in.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Based on the skew of what’s on the blacklist, it’d have been more efficient for Tesseract to run off a whitelist only for FHF corporate approved.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Lol the keywords list is hilarious, imagine publishing a list of things that rustle your jimmies.

  • chrisbit@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Thanks for your work uncovering this. Imposing this broad and undisclosed censorship upon the user is unacceptable, so we have stopped hosting Tesseract on our instance.

  • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I saw a funny weirdo saying that this person is just blocking “extremists”. How in the fuck doing this shit is not extreme extremist radical liberalism??? They like the status quo so much that they don’t want to see people complain about it LMAO

  • Mystic Mushroom [Ze/Zir]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I don’t think you should defend him. Integrating spam defense is a cover to censor his ideological opponents. The best lie is the one wrapped in truth. You shouldn’t frame any of what he did as being for good reasons. He hid it from the rest of us, made it look like an error message, and took steps to stop people from patching it out.

    That’s no what someone with good intentions does. That’s what someone who knows it’s wrong but tries to hide it does. Including spam domains in it can be seen as a way of hiding the rotten stuff and it gives trolls like him something to point at when it gets criticized “It’s a spam blocklist, you must be a freeze peach troll if you’re against that”.

    This is giving him too much charitability:

    A lot of that domain list is real spam defence. It filters conservatism as well as communism. “It targets the left” doesn’t survive the data and I’m not going to pretend it does.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Godfuckingdamnit. I was wondering why the system kept blocking our instance even after I removed it from the blacklist. I suspected some sort of lookup but I was out of time and couldn’t find it with a quick search. This is so much worse than I expected.

    Where does it dowload it exactly? I found the line loading policy.dat, but I can’t find any calls to tesseract.dubvee.org.

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    "^Article is paywalled.?$", "ACAB", ... "anarchistic", "biz@agoda.com", "billionaire [cock|dick]", "boot ?lick(ing|ers?)", ... "censoring me", "chatgip+ity+", "child-?rap(ing|ist)", "comrade", "conformist turd", "corpo ?(turd|slut|tech)", "death to", "dvdfab.cn", "enlightened centrist", "(epstein|epstien|pedo|pedophile)

    Sooo, they are pro-pedos, pro-billionares, pro-paywalled articles, anti-communism and anti-conservatism and get offended by “enlightened centrist”

    Yup, they pretend to be centrist or smth
    Disgusting

  • iByteABit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Let them shoot themselves on the foot, they are only providing more evidence that their ideology is the one that needs to control the narrative or else it shatters at the first sign of critical thought

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      are they still shooting themselves in the foot if there are currently 5 such examples, but we’ve only detected one and by accident?

      • iByteABit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Piefed was also detected, and also I’m not sure what your point is. Personally I’m sticking with the original software and the instance I’m on knowing that there’s no such ideological firewall with fake 404 errors so I don’t find out. People who agree with the Piefed and Tesseract dev’s worldviews can go there and enjoy their bubble if that’s their thing

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Sure dude, that’s why so many of us are right here with you going ‘fuck this,’ and so many of y’all are doing both-sides nonsense. The true face of the worldview is one crank everyone is mad at.