• CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Unless you absolutely want to contribute to the chromium monopoly, Firefox is right there and still free. If you’re concerned about the telemetry, LibreWolf is worth looking at.

  • KraeuterRoy@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Gonna call it now: that 60 quid ‘one time’ purchase is not gonna be the end of it.

    In, at most, a couple of years, one of these things will happen:

    • the model will be switched to a monthly subscription
    • features will be cut and sold separately
    • ‘limited, non-targeted’ ads ‘from trusted partners’ will be introduced
    • the thing will be buried completely because it’s not financially viable
    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Don’t forget the “major” version increment that breaks “lifetime”.

      • Oh, you’re mistaken. The license is for the lifetime of version 32. To use version 33 you must upgrade. But no rush, you have until version 33.1 before we activate the kill switch.
    • gankouskhan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Firefox+Betterfox is whatever brave is trying to do here, but free and open. Fuck brave and their scummy practices. Module isn’t perfect, but in comparison is clear.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Mozilla take note. You can actually get money from your users for a change, and not just through Google.

    Especially when your userbase, the people you’re supposedly building your browser for, keep telling you to keep AI out of it.

    Brave is actually listening to their users. Mozilla should feel humiliated that they never do.

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Huh, funnily enough, Ive introduced my own $60 fee if they want me to read the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy agreements that come along with their browser.

  • FilesForWallabies@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You can go into the settings and manually disable (nearly?) all the features that are removed in the paid version without paying anything. That’s what I did. They aren’t paywalling the ability disable the features.

    It doesn’t matter to me whether someone uses Brave or not, but the headline is misleading, though pedantically accurate.

    • octobob@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If you really want to use a chromium-based browser, Vivaldi does all this and for free. It’s not bad, definitely a bit faster than firefox but that’s the nature of the beast for the web these days. I also like having my tabs on the side rather than the top. I think you can do that with Firefox via an extension, I’ll have to play around. But I much prefer using Firefox in my daily life

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Vivaldi’s ad blocking is far worse. I’m not sure how they built it, but even after you disable the whitelists for their paying partners, it misses things Brave and uBO on Firefox don’t.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Vertical tabs is a built in function of FF. I think you just right click on a tab and there’s an option on the context menu to switch maybe?

        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          Only since like last year, so it’s not a huge surprise someone would be unaware.