• XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Mozilla take note. You can actually get money from your users for a change, and not just through Google.

    Especially when your userbase, the people you’re supposedly building your browser for, keep telling you to keep AI out of it.

    Brave is actually listening to their users. Mozilla should feel humiliated that they never do.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      I get all Mozilla hate, but I’d rake them twice before touching google with a 10m-pole.

      And what else have we got? Some more or less decent forks of either Firefox or chrome. Which still needs the base to exist.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Mozilla, the company that recently added a “disable AI” toggle to Firefox?

      It’s not as good as not implementing the things in the first place, for people who don’t want it, but making it a paid model for removing features would net them more flack, I feel. They’d be accused of trying to squeeze their user base, when Firefox is traditionally free.

      • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I saw that toggle for the first time today. Made me feel a little better about all the AI stuff and that sometimes my telemetry settings reset. I don’t know if the tele thing is ff or just my config to be clear. Today my wife asked me for how to get rid of the ai search summary in Chrome. That leads me to believe that even some “normies” aren’t thrilled with AI everywhere. I agree with you that a paid version of ff would rankle the community.