• JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Self hosting isn’t really compatible with viral content, you do something that blows up and either get the hug of death or go bankrupt from the bandwidth costs.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t matter if virality is the goal, unless you’re suggesting it be actively prevented, virality is just a natural phenomenon of the internet. The term viral generally implies uncontrolled exponential spread. To this day, stuff goes viral without people intending it to.

        And if you architect the system to scale a p2p network proportional to virality (ex. as people share it, they also self-host) you run into a ton of security and abuse challenges. We’re also stretching the definition of “self-hosting” at this point.

        • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I actually kind of love the idea of a per diem Unknown User Limit. Like the first 5000 unregistered users can view the site, but after that they get dropped at ingress. Also, limit user signups per day (this ain’t about growing user base, it’s about preventing virality)!

          Sure, you could still need an ingress server that can handle a high load to avoid the accidental ddos of word-of-mouth gets out about it, but that’s a million times lower of a requirement than a server that can handle serving a web page or app to the same number of users.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I actually kinda like the idea of a whole internet where avoiding virality is somehow built into the system. But I think such a system would naturally evolve into a p2p solution. You couldn’t stop people from taking and rehosting content on their own servers.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We are talking about a TikTok alternative. If getting as many people as possible to see your stuff isn’t your goal, then why would you post it in the first place?
        Making your content go viral is pretty much literally the only point.

        • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no such thing as a form of media that is only applicable to a specific scale of use. Long form and short form media is useful to large and small groups.

          For example, my partner coaches high school policy debate, which has long form video training content, short form content (30 seconds - 5 minutes) like clips from tournament rounds or practices, for recruitment, and very short form (1 - 30 second) clips that are mostly memes.

          Their shorter form content is explicitly meant not to be viral, it’s purely for their school, and other kids in their debate league. Most of it’s not even parsable by non-debaters. It’s only useful to their small community, but that’s what they want.

        • 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Virality is nowhere near the only reason for posting videos. People post them to make jokes, teach something, reply to someone else, etc, or all the same reasons someone might make a blogpost or a post on a link aggregator.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      this is what peertube tries to fix: everyone watching a peertube video (by default) will help server the data to other watching, so instead of the server needing to send all the data the viewers share the load.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of the time somebody namedropped a hobbyist’s project on prime time national radio in the UK. Their project was a train timetable tracker website, made because the official resource didn’t work too well. The site went down nearly instantly 🤣