• bl4kers@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I listened to an interview recently, I believe on BBC, where the interviewee said the biggest issue with peace talks is that the international community isn’t able to trust Putin to keep his word on whatever is agreed upon. I hadn’t considered that, but it makes a lot of sense and I’m not sure how that could change

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The international community being G7 countries accounting for 15% of world population. Nobody gives a fuck what the west thinks at this point.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same argument can be used in favor of Russia. NATO has invaded plenty of countries under false pretenses in the past. Both Russia and NATO do not have a reputation for keeping their promises.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Unironically yes, NATO members have invaded a lot of places, often in coalition with other member states.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s like saying Canada is responsible for something Mexico did because they’re both on the same continent…

            NATO is purely a defense agreement.