• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know there’s a ton of skepticism about Meta entering the fediverse — it’s completely understandable,” Cottle says. “I do want to kind of make a plea that I think everyone on the team has really good intentions. We really want to be a good member of the community and give people the ability to experience what the fediverse is.”

    Your intentions mean exactly nothing when you’re being paid by Zuckerberg.

    It also doesn’t actually matter what you intend, because the problem isn’t just what the platform can do, it’s about Meta being in this space and trying to stake a claim in it. We came here to escape you. Go the fuck away.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? I don’t care what their intentions are, if they continue to house hate groups, their “intentions” count for exactly nothing

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Their intentions don’t matter. Meta’s only intention is make line go up. They will either consume or extinguish the fediverse with the rest of the corps. I’ll be leaving lemmy.world the minute thread federates. I’m just gonna be a lazy ass until then.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought I understood lemmy.world’s position several months ago was to not federate with Threads. This was the vocal position of many instances. Has this changed?

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Defederate.

    They can have a corporate silo. They can use an open standard. But they cannot do anything good for the fediverse. The best thing for the fediverse is to let them exist as a walled garden (and we can put up the wall).

    There are about 10 million users on the free fediverse. That number has grown steadily and sustainably. There are 160 million threads users. They were instantaneously leveraged onto the platform by a billion dollar corporation (possibly in violation of antitrust laws).

    If we federate, Threads won’t become a part of the fediverse; threads will become the fediverse.

    EEE

    • VolcanoWonderpants@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can find servers based on Threads defederation through this site. Since you don’t want anything to do with Threads, I suggest filtering by ‘blocked’ and ‘Fedipact’ I’m not sure what the difference is between the two is though, so I’d appreciate if someone would explain.

        • VolcanoWonderpants@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s a really good site too, though I suggest using fedipact.veganism.social if you’re specifically interested in which instances are defederated from Threads. Some instances have hidden blocklists and won’t show if they have defederated Threads if you search through defed.xyz.

          For example: You can only see that retro.pizza and masto.ai have hidden blocklists if you look through defed.xyz. However, if you look on fedipact.veganism.social, you can see that retro.pizza has joined the Fedipact against Threads, while masto.ai is fully federated with them.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t really care about that, but given that defederation with particular instances is a good way to get a feel for what content and instance allows/disallows, it’d be nice to be able to filter instances on https://lemmyverse.net and https://lemmy.fediverse.observer and https://kbin.fediverse.observer by whether an instance is defederated or not with some list of other instances. Like, maybe you want an instance that federates with instances providing pornography (lemmynsfw.com) but not extremist political positions (hexbear.net). Right now, it’s a very manual process to check the federation list on many instances.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I signed the fedipact yet mine isn’t listed there, at least it says “blocked”.

      • lemmeout@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How does one “move” to a different instance? Or do I have to make a new account and start over?

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You create a new account on a new instance and then you export your subscriptions and settings from your old Lemmy server to your new ones, you lose your comment history but that doesn’t really matter on Lemmy like your post history does on Masto

          • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            When you say export, is there a tool for that for, like, mass exporting your subs? Or do I have to manually search each one and sub again?

            I ask because I’ve been meaning to switch to my alt, but I made a point of subbing to as many communities as possible to make Lemmy more fun to use for me, and good lord, it’s a lot to do.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was thinking about joining one that’s federated with them. I’d get a look at the normal side of the internet, what’s going on there without having to join I forgot what’s it called.

  • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck letting the Zuckin billionaire into this party! Build your own shit communities with your own shitty user base

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The idea that they will destroy it by just… Being a bigger instance? Because they can influence development? Isn’t this shit developed by a tanky? A self-proclaimed stalinist? Why the hell would they capitulate to a megacorp? I’m more worried about the actual developers ruining this shit than Meta and Threads.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if you aren’t against federating with threads on principle part of the challenge is going to be able to keep up with moderating their entire user base en-masse and being able to afford the cost of federating content from so many users at once.

        It’s a burden I doubt a lot of smaller instances can handle.

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You make a very good point there. That’s probably the best reasoning to be against federating with them I’ve seen. It also brings up duplication of content. If they have so many users, would it be possible that a smaller instance getting content from them could literally fill up all their storage space, assuming it’s not a gigantic data center but something self-hosted? Text may not be problematic, but images from Instagram can be massive. I suppose if your instance was that small you’d already be picking and choosing what to federate with, though.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mostly agree. The one thing I will say in favour of defederation is hate content. Meta has incredibly lax moderation. People can literally say “this person deserves to be killed”, or even “I would absolutely murder this person if I came across them” and Meta will be like “yeah we understand this may be disappointing to you, but we’re gonna allow that to stay” if you report it.

        • Dnn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I saw that here, too. Thought about reporting when I saw the sidebar didn’t even have a rule against it (forgot which community though - my app doesn’t present that in an obvious way)

      • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, by being a bigger instance with piss poor moderation. We’d be overrun with trolls and spammers

      • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        they could develop new features but intentionally implement them in a way that they are not compatible with other services. they could put all the other instances they federate with on rolling blackouts so that it seems like they are down when in fact it’s just them cutting the connection. doing just these two things with purpose could make it look like Facebook has the most advanced and stable instance. in addition, as you mentioned, it would also have the biggest populace. there would be pressure to abandon other instances to join that instance to stay in touch.

          • kurwa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why would that happen anyway? A lot of people already came here from bigger sites, like reddit for example. If we don’t federate, then why would people who are already here be pushed by something that isn’t there?

    • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I don’t understand the issue.

      People want the fediverse to grow, so FB entering it is a good thing no? Otherwise realistically the fediverse will likely stagnate and always just take up a tiny bit of space.

      The more people involved the better. Sometimes I feel this group just wants to shoot themselves in the foot.

      • Zink@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I DON’T want the fediverse to grow if that growth is full of extremists, hate groups, porn bots, etc.

        • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But the fediverse already has that lol. I’ve had arguments here with extremists many times.

          You won’t just magically cure it by stopping FB from federating. Putting your fingers in your ears and closing your eyes doesn’t make it go away.

          • Zink@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            But we’re talking our current problem but instead expanded into a community 80 times the size of the fediverse. That’s a little more hate than we’ve got now, no?

            • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              So what do you want exactly? Do you want the fediverse to remain small and irrelevant forever? Or do you want it to grow and become the dominant space with more bad actors but more useful actors as well?

              Because you can’t have both, and you will always have more extremists and shitty views with larger groups. I for one think the fediverse is a better implementation of the social tech for pack of a better word, and would prefer its implementation over the closed wall implementation of non fediverse applications.

            • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’ll have both though in the fediverse… So it’s pretty irrelevant. Just because you don’t see them doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

              • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Outside of the odd troll here and there, fascism isn’t a huge problem (at least on lemmy). Exploding heads died in like a week and you haven’t really seen any popular resurgence of far right politics here since. Can’t speak for the rest of the fediverse but lemmy seems to have carved out a semi-comfy niche for itself

                • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I haven’t seen far rights here myself, but it’s a self selecting bias.

                  I’ve definitely come across more far lefts here than any other platform I’ve used which are equally as bad as far right imo.

                  I’m always concerned if there is only one strong group representation like that though. I’d rather have no extremists obviously, but if we have one side at least allow the other, otherwise that sort of crap starts seeping elsewhere.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lemmy already is full of extremists and hate groups. Perhaps you mean you don’t want hate groups you don’t agree with?

    • spiderman@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah if threads integration means that i could interact with my friends threads posts with mastodon account i don’t mind it. it’s not like they are gonna use mastodon. maybe there might be a chance that people on threads might visit mastodon once they are fed up with spams on threads.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was kind of hoping the hysteria would be over by now. Walled gardens are a bad thing, I’m pleased when holes are poked in them.

  • ThePancake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    <sigh> I’ll miss my cozy little Lemmy…

    The upsides are apparent for the platform, but there’s no denying that change will be inevitable for all of us, whether some instances choose to defederate or not.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What your Lemmy feed looks like is 90% up to you. Subscribe to things that you find interesting and block what you don’t want to see.

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    With about a thousand new daily sign ups to mastodon it feels like it is going back to its rapid degrowth that it has been on before the Twitter debacle.