Exactly. China took the leap of the century by investing in renewables, and it paid off big time. Other Global South countries are slowly following suit. Energy, digital and cultural sovereignty should be actively sought out for lest of being beholden to Western imperialism and hegemony.

Developing countries, especially China, led the clean energy charge but richer nations including the US and EU relied more than before on planet-warming fossil fuels for electricity generation.

China remains way ahead in clean energy growth […]

India experienced slower electricity demand growth and also added significant new solar and wind capacity, meaning it too cut back on coal and gas.

In contrast, developed nations like the US, and also the EU, saw the opposite trend.

I’ve not read a single BBC rag article for a while now, are they usually this sloppy nowadays with how they portray the West in the best light LOL… Looks like they gave up trying mid-way. Very poetic.

🤲

🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻

The libs flocked here to pearl clutch over “illegal immigration” instead of to wonder why said “illegal immigrants” had to be cuffed and ankle-restrained, why these workers were targetted in the first place (and how the U.S. benefits from mass deportations if their economy is fueled by violated migrants who had their countries destroyed by the U.S.) and why tf aren’t they released yet.

lol np

i thought this was about Austria lol. Also “[Euroanglo-Zionazi] told them to” is just code for US telling them to do so. The attack was obviously a psyop that allowed headlines like “Why Iran Hit Australia” and “Revelations Iran was behind antisemitic attacks show IRGC tentacles have reached Australia” to churn out. Clear as day consent manufacturing to justify yet another imminent bombing campaign on Iran.

They’re still settling in and occupying a land that doesn’t belong to them. They’re not doing it for moral reasons. They simply want all the treats, with none of the obligations of a Euroanglo-Zionazi settler-colonialist that they are.

Let it be clear that “neutrality” just means helping to maintain the settler-colony entity occupying Palestine and capitulating to their Western siblings no-problem while not saying much publicly about the U.S. State Department list of definitely-ontologically-bad-countries-and-resistance-groups list.

Yes, this too applies to Switzerland, Andorra, Ireland, Lichtenstein, Malta, Monaco and so on.

Apparently not. Russia’s had their license to whitedom revoked, which lasted between the 90s and late 2000s, so only bad-bad things happens in Russia and all good-good democratic things happens in the West (which they are no longer a part of), sweaty. They need to apply to renew their license so they can do good-good things.

Pragmatically speaking, that’s why denazification efforts should be done at the source of all of Global South’s miseries: in the West, outside the occupation.

The entity is literally on life support from the West, because the entity IS the West, it is the West’s liberalism at its peak projected on to West Asia (and that’s not an exaggeration, this is why I deliberately use the term “Euroanglo-Zionazi”).

Take China as an example, reeducation efforts didn’t occur in Syria or Iraq to curb the thousands (IIRC) of Xinjiang opportunist terrorists (and domestic) joining CIA’s ISIS, but rather it was done directly in Xinjiang, with some degree of success. Of course the deindustrialized West won’t follow this example because it absolutely needs Nazism and in general, liberalism, to sustain itself.

The point is, if liberalism continues to be the modus operandi in the West, settler-colonies and other forms of imperialism won’t stop being a thing. This is why liberation of the Global South from its Western shackles should be the prime focus, comrade.

regular people in israel

They are Euroanglo-Zionazi Settler-Colonialists.

Euro, because most of them are European, most previously came from Eastern Europe, and on top of that, the white settlers dominate the political, social and economic aspects of the entity. Nowadays they come from all over, but the largest influx is still from Europe, the aforementioned dominating group is the same.

Anglo, because USonian, Australian, Canadian, etc… settlers just couldn’t get enough out of settling in land that don’t belong to them, so they want a take-two.

Zionist, because the settlers needed a crutch to justify their presence, their occupation and the existence of the entity, the settlers chose Judaism for their symbolism (don’t get it twisted, Zionism is not a religious belief), and bastardized the living hell out of it to create an artificial identity of their own and to purposefully conflate the religion with their racist, white supremacist, colonial beliefs.

Nazi, because Zionism is the successor to Nazism (again, nothing to do with Judaism).

Settler, because they’re occupiers forcing their presence upon the indigenous’ land via expulsion, ethnic cleansing, genocide, etc… to make way for more settlers.

Colonialist, because they’re stealing the land’s resources from its rightful people, because they are trying to canonize the Indigenous’ food, art, way of life, history, etc… as part of their own superficial “culture”, because they’re revising history to justify even more settler-colonialist behaviors described here.

I’m saying all of this because there are no “regular people” in the entity. At best, they are reservists. To monolithize the Euroanglo-Zionazi entity with every other country from the “Middle East”, then suggest that religion (a HUGE contributing factor to the actual culture of West Asia) should be erased from the collective consciousness of Levantine and Gulf Muslims, Jews (not European Zionazis) and Christians whom at one point co-existed just fine* without the West’s meddling, all because of the actions of settler-colonialists, is downright ignorant, knowing all of the previously mentioned descriptors.

* There were some minor problems (relatively speaking), but none of them justify Westerners playing dress-up and going into land that don’t belong to them.

Why should the indigenous have to wait until the entire sex abusing lunatic Euroanglo-Zionazi society are done looking at their own crimes against humanity, when they already have for 90+ years and already have livestreamed their own warcrimes that include their own laughter before for the entire world to see?

Descending from the Discovery Doctrine, then Manifest Destiny, then Lebensraum, then to today’s Greater “Israel”, we should understand that the West never learned their lesson, and never intend to do so today or tomorrow, not Germany, not France, not the U.S., and especially not the Zionazi settlers. Even if denazification were to take place in the way that you suggest, it doesn’t change the fact that they are settlers, occupiers and a whole lot among them sex criminals, all currently occupying the land rightfully belonging to Palestinians.

It’s not even an ultra position to want settlers out and to want landback (even both of these and Nuremberg would be too kind of a punishment given the depravity of the entity and its vile society).

If I haven’t stressed this enough or hinted at this, I urge you to consider focusing on the liberation of the occupied, not on solving the occupier’s depravity.

That starts and ends with the Euroanglo-zionazis fucking off where they belong to, or facing resistance. They’ve had decades upon decades to do so.

Where denazification should actually take place is within their respective home countries from they actually come from. But sadly none of this seems to be ever happening soon, or at all.

It’s imperial core media, it will always serve the interest of the Br*tish and the U.S.

“S4uD1Pwnz”

They’re still stuck in the early 2010s with these Battlefield/COD ass names and PR style, lol…

I’m not sure what your political stance is, frankly idc, but based on that last sentiment it steers too close to anti-warism, so I’ll just give you the benefit of the doubt this one time, maybe you’ll see what we see:

My meaning from my reply is that monolithizing the two issues with statements like “Both can be bad at the same time, actually!” is drawing a comparison, which is not only tone-deaf, but completely misses the point that @AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml made: that entire original comment of OP’s directly applies to Palestinians in Palestine. And it does, it absolutely does, and there’s no denying it does.

The difference here is in the direct applicability of things, sweeping statements like “both bad” especially in the context of Palestine only serve to trivialize issues, it doesn’t offer any specific insight.

It also helps their case that one’s a literal ongoing genocide on an indigenous population while having already been subjugated to 70+ years of ethnic cleansing as a result of Euro-Anglo settler-colonialism (which continues to this day) and the other’s a war the West kicked a hornet’s nest for that started in 2022 between bougies… There’s nothing wrong with sympathizing with the latter, there’s just something wrong with flattening multi-dimensional degrees of suffering and one degree of suffering all into one degree, as if they were on an even-playing field, so to speak. The other difference here is that you get, at best, tone-policed or at worst, silenced and/or jailed, for publicly sympathizing for the former.

And hey: they did not need to preface that Ukraine’s full of Nazis or something to that effect, I seriously don’t see how their point would be “more valid”, even if the prefacing statement was true. Needlessly tone policing like this, a tactic used by libs extensively to derail and dissuade anyone from basically saying anything, isn’t really okay at all…

You’re really going to compare pedophiliac EuroAnglo-zionazi settler-colonialism, open-air concentration camps, wholesale murder and targeting of children, women and unarmed men, wholesale sexual violence (whether on the living or dead), land desecration, cultural erasure, etc… to a war on a country that still has active clubs and bars?

Your logic is:

West = bad Russia is anti-west Russia = good

Peak interpretation of geopolitical issues that was famously proposed by davel. Except if they did propose this, which they didn’t, they’d be right (with some revisions here and there) anyway.

West bad because West do bad bad things to Global South.

Russia is “anti-west”, but only by circumstance of not allowing themselves to be sold to the highest bidder in Washington, despite Russia themselves having had requested to join their Kolonial Konquest Klub (read: NATO), which make Papa Sam and Santa Claus very angry!!

Russia is therefore good…for the Global South as they get a tiny yet much needed breathing room from being brutally exploited while cheerleaders for Western imperialism like you blabber on about some bullshit.

Does this bedtime-story-esque diction help you understand things better?

Tom Artiom Alexandrovich

Ah yes, such famously indigenous male names in Palestine…

Disgusting waste of breath…

More word-salad that basically amount to patronizing “it’s nuanced” ageism is all I’m reading here, fucking racist age-chauvinist.

The others in other threads have clearly expressed their points in great detail as to why Western regimes, currently committing genocide and adding multiple war crimes under their belt, are not “liberating”, “civilized” states upholding “civil liberties”. Applying jurisprudence to regime changes, land-grabbing, enslavement, disappearance, murders and torture and going through court circus to justify their actions doesn’t make them “civilized” or much better than their client states, European settler.