• lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 hours ago

        An elegant solution. I wonder if it is more efficient than a 1TW data centre.

        Seriously, though, we use AI in the worst way possible. I like writing code, I hate checking someone else’s code. Why aren’t AIs doing the checking and engineers doing the coding?

        Forget “human in the loop” - let’s shoot for “reviewed by AI”. Deep down, we know the humans are barely paying attention when they check Claude’s homework.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Forget “human in the loop” - let’s shoot for “reviewed by AI”

          yeah uh, nah, thanks. I would not trust it any more than I trust the current shit show.

        • melfie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I can attest this does work well. Having LLMs review your plans for how to do something and point out what you missed works well too. I also have my local LLM review creative writing without writing anything, give feedback about my Blender renders and other artistic things, and be a sounding board for ideas in general. Be warned that Qwen has no mercy and will shit all over your passion projects.

        • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The drinking bird only works if it’s dipping it’s velvert covered head into water, the lower water temp creates a temo difference moving the liquid in the glass tube within the bird