• lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    An elegant solution. I wonder if it is more efficient than a 1TW data centre.

    Seriously, though, we use AI in the worst way possible. I like writing code, I hate checking someone else’s code. Why aren’t AIs doing the checking and engineers doing the coding?

    Forget “human in the loop” - let’s shoot for “reviewed by AI”. Deep down, we know the humans are barely paying attention when they check Claude’s homework.

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I can attest this does work well. Having LLMs review your plans for how to do something and point out what you missed works well too. I also have my local LLM review creative writing without writing anything, give feedback about my Blender renders and other artistic things, and be a sounding board for ideas in general. Be warned that Qwen has no mercy and will shit all over your passion projects.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Forget “human in the loop” - let’s shoot for “reviewed by AI”

      yeah uh, nah, thanks. I would not trust it any more than I trust the current shit show.

    • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The drinking bird only works if it’s dipping it’s velvert covered head into water, the lower water temp creates a temo difference moving the liquid in the glass tube within the bird