• 18107@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    AI is absolutely not needed for this, and is only a liability.

    They could say “press 1 if you are calling about X” or even “if you are calling about X, we are already aware of it. If not, you will be transferred to an operator in a moment”.

    An automated system like this is easy to implement, easy to audit, and will fail in expected and managable ways.
    AI is nondeterministic, and will fail randomly in very unexpected ways.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I (mostly) agree. I was just TL;DR’ing it for the shocking number of people who are commenting about things that are already addressed in the article that they didn’t bother reading.

      I hesitate to agree with “absolutely” though. I don’t know enough about their situation to confidently have an opinion that strong[1].

      AI can be useful for some dynamic situations – and 911 call centers can get pretty “dynamic” at times.

      Imagine a busy 911 call center. Clippy appears (wearing a firefighter uniform) on an operator’s screen with a message like “The last 4 calls were about the same car fire. There are currently 9 calls in the queue. Want me to triage?” It would take WAY less time for a busy operator to click “Yes” than it would to step away and go record some voice message, configure some automated thing, etc.


      1. I only ever knew one dispatcher personally, and even in her town (much lower population than New Orleans’), they were overworked. ↩︎