• unitedwithme@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Time to sue Wisconsin police dept for fucking that one up!! The Canadians did their job based on false information!

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Maybe the Canadian police, but the Canadian court did not. They convicted him with zero corroborating evidence and without carefully comparing the chat logs with his actual account.

    • terabyterex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      The Canadians did their job

      no they did not. i would agree with you if all Canadian authorities did was search the computers but once they found nothing, it should have eneded. how do you convict a man with no evidence?

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        And real culprit is still our there free doing his thing. That’s fuck up and I blame his attorney as well. Probably PD who didn’t give a shit and was "forced to represent the pedophile "

        Feel bad for man he didn’t just lose 18 months of his life. But everything. His home, probably his job. On top of some people he knew will always look at him differently and some will believe he is guilty. He needs millions upon millions of dollars. But if we really want to fix this shit. Prosecute the judge, prosecutor and fucking police and give them just as much time.

        Maybe then they think twice when trying to Prosecute an innocent person.

      • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Probably under the assumption the data was deleted. But yeah, the fact a typo was missed by all is rough

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Probably under the assumption the data was deleted.

          Which is why allowing that sort of inference to be made, under any circumstances, is absolutely tyrannical.