• jobbies@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Was a loyal Ford (european) customer but I don’t want an SUV version of the mustang, a massive truck or whatever the new ‘Capri’ is (its not a Capri).

    And why are they all so ugly??

    Wtf happened to Ford??

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Whenever the US car industry seems to be moving towards EVs a major correction takes place and more huge vehicles appear instead. They obviously aren’t serious and will go the way of the buggy whip if they can’t replace management with people who can plan for the long term.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I got to ride in a Li Auotmotive i9 Ultra the other day and it was amazing. Ridiculously luxurious and far ahead of tesla. Cheaper too. It had a fridge and microwave, and big screens everywhere. Its Lidar view of everything around the car was vastly superior to Tesla’s, and it has about 15x the computing power of my model 3.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    No, our answer is that EVs are dumb and that oil is the only energy source that matters in this century and every century to come.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The headline suggests it’s a problem that the USA is working on. Evidence suggests that in fact the approach being taken is to imitate an ostrich, and bury the collective head in oil and gas money.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      While the government might be doing that, the US auto manufactures are taking a different approach. GM makes some nice EVs.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Genuinely, have they? All the EV news I hear from the US is projects stalling or getting cancelled.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Those are what make the news. GM has a lot of EVs that look just like the ICE of the same name and they don’t get much news.

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Sounds like a better plan that what Europe is doing. Laxing Chinese imports and Chinese owned factories on EU soil while also opening more doors for more “Overseas Police Service Stations” that everyone apparently forgot about.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This is what happens when you let the oil industry and their lobbyists have unfettered control of the narrative and legislation .You get a huge number of politicians falling into their pockets, and progress is stymied at every turn.

    It’s actually kind of surprising America has made the limited progress on EVs that we have. But it’s nowhere near enough. And now we are paying the piper.

    • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      American voters are doing their part to “help,” crying about “high” fuel prices (less than half of what they are here) when one of the big issues is that undertaxation of petrol has led to underinvestment in alternatives.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This has very little to do with oil industry lobbyists, and a whole lot to do with the whole world outsourcing their production and labor to a country with no worker protections.

      • Riverside@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That would explain Chinese dominance in vehicles in general, not EVs in particular.

        Also, Chinese EV manufacturing facilities are so efficient precisely because they’re so incredibly highly automated, nothing to do with worker rights regardless of your opinion of China.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That would explain Chinese dominance in vehicles in general, not EVs in particular.

          Do ya see a bunch of Chinese ICE vehicles running around?

          Also, Chinese EV manufacturing facilities are so efficient precisely because they’re so incredibly highly automated

          They’re efficient because they have no concept of workers’ rights or IP. Not because they’re a country full of geniuses, and not because Big Oil is keeping them down, regardless of your opinion on China.

          • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            There are plenty of Chinese ICE vehicles, what on earth are you talking about ? MG got rolling here in the UK with ICE before releasing hybrids and EVs, Chery only have ICE and hybrids here etc etc Same in Australia with BYD and the rest.

            You’re poorly informed.

          • Riverside@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Nah, you’re just a propagandized westerner who hasn’t done the most cursory research on the degree of automation in Chinese EV industry. Enjoy malding in your ignorance while your country’s industry crashes and burns

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              The degree of automation is not relevant to a discussion about why they’re being kept out of other countries, or anything to do with Big Oil.

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That China has terrible workers rights is a fact. That China also has a lot of automation is an unrelated fact that is also true.

                • Ulrich@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Its unrelated to a conversation about the oil industry and lobbyists, obviously, yes.

                • bluGill@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Mostly. Price is a complex problem. Cost is a floor factor and automation affects that somehow. It is hard to know when automation lower prices as this depends on relative labor costs which have been going up in China.

  • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The answer continues to be: do everything it can to ignore China exists, and insulate the industry from having to compete.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      How very free market of them. Seems like it would be so shitty to be a real republican - their party has totally abandoned those ideals.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Of course they “have an answer to EVs”. It’s to crush them or make them so outrageously expensive only the very wealthy will afford them.

    And you know why? Because that’s how we voted.

  • P1k1e@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Make decent vehicles that don’t spy on people or track them…fucking morons

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Of course they do:

    1. Ban Chinese cars period
    2. Add an additional $130/year tax on EVs, in case one of those heathen cars actually gets sold here
    3. Ignore the rest of the world and taut how well the US makers are doing in the US
    4. ???
    5. Profit
  • sanitation@lemmy.radioOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s kind of 30th trimester. Too late for abortion Steve - China domnitates and we have no answer

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The US has actively worked against EVs for over 100 years….