The fuck are you getting that from? I didn’t talk about wealth, nor happiness, nor ego and status, nor how any of those things justify working for a horrifyingly evil company.

I talked about a dignified livelihood. You know, being able to pay rent, utilities, groceries, gas and put a little aside so medical emergencies or unexpected expenses don’t trap you in irrecoverable debt.

Is your argument “People should rather starve”? Is the only ethical existence one outside of exploitative, fucked up systems?

I’m sure that many are indeed there because of the money. My argument is that condemning the employees wholesale is likely to catch people that don’t deserve this vilification. My suggestion is to direct that rage against the fucked-up system that both enables exploitative dependencies on employment and allows companies like Meta to exist in the first place.