• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t mind giving my date of birth to all the services I already pay for with credit card but face scanning? That’s just creepy. Fuck off.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Even using a credit card for something like Spotify is already giving out more information than is needed.

        • disco@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          He’s saying if you have a credit card to pay there’s no need to verify (I think)

          Edit: nah I’m wrong, cheers

          • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I just hate credit cards since they are like the worst payment method unless you want to dig a financial hole for yourself

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Only if you’re bad with money. Nothing wrong with credit cards themselves, and most of them these days are credit/debit cards.

    • npdean@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Date of birth (with some other details) is kind of a sensitive information in the right hands

      • Avicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        given that governments are now starting to make certain protests illegal, definitely not as bad as having your face in a database and your behaviour being mapped for suspicious illegal activity like criticising genocide.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re right and I’d go a bit further: It’s none of their business what your age even is, they need to know only one bit for their legal duties, over or under age of majority.

        Basically what is really needed is a certificate of majority digitally signed by the government bound to some identifier, email address or full name. All this uploading faces or ID card scans is ridiculous.

    • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      *so that the government can say kids won’t watch porn.

      Rule 1 of computers that everyone who has taught an ICT class learns - if little Timmy wants titties, he finds a way.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Who taught you sex is a drug? As long as words mean their definitions, it’s categorically not. Plus it’s probably kinda harmful to pile on the stigma already surrounding sex by conflating it with drugs and all the stigma that comes with that.

        Hopefully I’m wrong, but it’s kinda giving a nofap pseudoscience red flag to me.

        Parents definitely should be teaching their kids about this stuff at the appropriate time, but they should stick to the facts.

        • valkyre09@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          First they came for the sex, then they came after the drugs. Now they’re trying to take my rock and roll

        • Final Remix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean… it is a rush of dopamine and can become addictive. Same as a videogame or gambling though. Not a drug but can get unhealthy if it leads to maladaptive daily functioning.

    • PotatoLibre@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      In Sweden pretty much anybody has Bank Id, an app which is connected to a bank account and which can function as a valid identification.

      App belongs a private company, but it’s still trustworthy and everybody can sign government docs with that.

      This is how you should do age verification, through a third party app, not like any site will get your id/picture to just end in their DBs ready to be stolen.

      Every government should create an app for the online id, I don’t get why this seems so hard to achieve.

        • PotatoLibre@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Do you prefer to give your personal id to any site in the world instead of using the same app which you pay your taxes with?

            • PotatoLibre@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Like other medias before, internet probably has reached a need for some harder control. I’m not talking about porn, I’m talking about disinformation, bots and soon AI.

              Not sure which is the best way but I’ll not give any id or credit card to any randim site in order to see their content.

  • ckmnstr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t threaten, just do it. Enshittification must end.

    The only reason we have mainstream paid video streaming now is because early Netflix was genuinely better than dodgy, pop-up riddled mirrors on movie4k.to. The convenience was well worth 8 bucks a month. Same for Spotify.

    Fast forward 10 years and Spotify wants me to pay 15 €, scan my face and listen to forced podcast ads AND pay extra for paywalled audiobooks that used to be free? Meet my good old friend youtube-downloader, then.

  • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    what are “spotify fans”? Spotify paid 150k $ for Trump’s inauguration party, f them. They do not deserve my money

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    ah from shady porn sites, like spotify and wikipedia. definitely protect kids from porn there. /s

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Let this be a reminder to never turn away from piracy. It needs to constantly be in the background and if any company gets like they always do, then it comes back out. But if we let the knowledge fade away then it’s impossible to rebuild it.

    • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Piracy preserves media.

      Piracy preserves art.

      Piracy makes sure, that future generations still have access to the creations of humanity.

      Data hoarding is a service to the public.

  • GTG3000@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    …funnily enough, it may actually be better for musicians if people left spotify, considering the absolute pennies they pay per stream.

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Does Spotify really have “fans”? Or maybe just users? And what user spends time “threatening” piracy, if they know how to do it?

    Also, I realized only last month that my younger brother doesn’t know how to use torrents. Shame on me for having left home too early!

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Or you know you could punish parents for not parenting. Like if kids are watching porn and caught and if it’s actually against some law then go after the parents.

    It’s not hard to teach parents how to implement a filtering DNS. But no, countries think they need to be the nanny.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s just the pretext they give to justify it. The real reason is surveillance. Now they have a way to confidently tie your accounts to your individual identity. And most of these solutions use third parties which will then sell that data as well, so now anyone can tie your account to you without you ever knowing.

      Even if the government is barred from surveilling citizens in these ways, third parties aren’t, and the government can just buy that information, no warrant needed anymore.

      And these laws never stop at porn, it’s drugs, LGBTQ information, etc. and they can always easily add additional things later with little fanfare.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Protecting children” is just the pretext under which governments can sell increased surveillance. The fact that there are more effective ways they could act to protect children, yet governments everywhere continue to push for ID checks and monitoring online activity, shows that the aim isn’t what they say it is.

  • fading_person@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t threaten, just do it!

    I don’t get why people are so stubborn to move away from corporate products.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Back to Piracy! ✊🏴‍☠️

    Really though? It isn’t necessary. Use Bandcamp, you probably have half your artists covered. The rest - one of those Spotify alternatives: Tidal? Qobuz?

    Personally I do selfhost btw. Jellyfin, though I heard of a better alternative specifically for music recently - and forgot the name again 😥 Something lowercase, like a verb… “normalize” or some such. Navidrome! Thanks @0konomiyaki@aussie.zone

    • 0konomiyaki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Navidrome maybe? But I use jellyfin + symfonium myself. All my music is either bandcamp or used CDs. Started collecting music late last year and my entire collection is legally sourced now. No piracy required. Hardest part was starting very small and building the collection over time.

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes! Navidrome!

        used CDs

        I get them dirt cheap or completely for free. It’s actually reverse piracy (no I’m not serious) since no doubt the previous owners ripped everything.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I would suggest Qobuz (if available) or Tidal. Deezer’s CEO is a hard-core religious nutjob who finances anti-trans orgs and sexual conversion “therapies”.

        • Kacarott@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sorry for replying to an old comment, but do you have some source to support this? I am searching online but finding nothing :(

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’ll be honest with you - I read that from someone else either here or on Reddit (and they provided some links that looked legit), but I also can’t find it anymore. Maybe it was about the previous CEO, the original founder? Not sure, so you can ignore that whole part when choosing a streaming service.

            I’d still pick Qobuz because of how much more they pay artists, though.