Owners of the affected trucks will require replacement hardware.

    • dditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hard to understand the calculus of people who would still be willing to buy a Tesla at this point. They’re literal death traps with shoddy manufacturing

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    An actual recall that requires a hardware fix / replacement this time, and not a software update.

    Am I reading the PDF right in that 1% or 2,431 trucks are affected, meaning they sold ~240k trucks?

    Edit: official numbers are more around 30-40k worldwide as far as I can find. Idk how to read it, perhaps they mean 2,431 is the maximum but the expectation is 1%?

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ford, Chevrolet, and Dodge each sold over 700k half-ton pickup trucks last year, while Toyota sold only 130k Tundras. I suppose it’s possible that there are a quarter million suckers out there.

      • Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those are all more affordable, reliable, and established brands though.

  • espentan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I keep forgetting how nasty they look… I’m glad I don’t have to see these on European roads. Not yet, at least.

    • elgordino@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt they’ll ever come to Europe. They don’t meet even the most basic crash safety standards. These things are designed to annihilate pedestrians, not to try to reduce harm.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t really care what they look like. If any truck actually could meet the promises these made, I’d buy the shit out of them:

      -All electric

      -Sophisticated sensor suite to improve operational safety

      -Working performance comparable to F150

      -low maintenance

      -Can be used as home power backup

      -not a Deathtrap

      -not a Killing machine

      It hits the electric points, but that’s it. It’s a bad truck. It doesn’t fulfill any of the “smart” promises. Death trap killing machines in constant recall that can’t handle rain… Let alone do work.

      The aesthetic doesn’t even make my list of complaints. It’s like the whole industry has been trying to make trucks as shitty as possible for like 30 years. Give me a '94 ranger electric conversion kit and it’s game fucking over cyber truck.

    • schema@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They look like they have been on the streets for 10 years. Turns out stainless steel isn’t all that stainless.

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I ran into a former coworker (we still work at the same place, just different groups now) at a work thing recently and he told me I had to see his new car.

    It was this. I told him it was ugly. He tried to show me all the bells and whistles. I told him I was glad he liked it, but it was still ugly.

    He said yeah…that’s what my wife says too. She hates it.

    lol

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why don’t they just fix it and then release it rather than releasing it for 15 minutes and then recalling it again?

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You get the thing that represents all cyber truck owners: a lollipop, or as it’s also known—a “sucker.”