• tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does it?

      Previous benchmarks have shown the 8 GB models seriously fell behind in performance.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I think the joke just flew over your head.

        Apple keeps saying that their RAM is somehow magic and therefore better than Windows RAM, which is a comment that obviously makes no sense.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think they are able to share it with the GPU or something? It is maybe slightly better but it sure as fuck is not 2x better.

          8 GB, even if it is “magic RAM,” is a joke amount and has been for a long time.

          • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s just an APU, see consoles and laptops. The unified memory is basically just the above, but Apple also claims that due to Apple Silicon having the storage controller on board, the swap is magically faster 🤷

            Also Mac OS/Linux use less RAM than Windows which certainly helps.

            8GB is “fine™” on a MacBook Air, but it’s criminal for a Pro machine, and it certainly should not cost £200 for an extra 8GB. That’s genuinely insane pricing

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The annoying thing is I have had people claim that 8GB and 16GB is fine on Apple and works better than on PC laptops. To the point one redditor point blank refused to believe I owned an Apple laptop. I literally had to take a photograph of said laptop and show it to them before they would believe me about the RAM capacity.

      • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I own a 8GB MacBook Pro for work, it’s definitely better than a PC with 8GB of RAM, but not better or even close to a PC with 16GB. Just the amount of stutters/freezes while the swap file goes is insane

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe this is true if you use Windows. If you use Linux on your PC versus macOS on a MacBook you will probably find the PC performs comparably if not better.

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My Linux machine has 64 GiB of RAM, which is like 128 GiB of Mac RAM. It’s still not enough

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Serious question what are you using all that RAM for? I am having a hard time justifying upgrading one of my laptops to 32 GiB, nevermind 64 GiB.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, while the current iPhone 15 Pro is the only model which has 8 GB of RAM, with the regular iPhone 15 having 6 GB. All iPhone 16 models (launching next month) will still only have 8 GB according to rumors, which happens to be the bare minimum required to run Apple Intelligence.

      Giving the new models only 8 GB seems a bit shortsighted and will likely mean that more complex AI models in future iOS versions won’t run on these devices. It could also mean that these devices won’t be able to keep a lot of apps ready in the background if running an AI model in-between.

      16 GB is proper future-proofing on Google’s part (unless they lock new software features behind newer models anyway down the road), and Apple will likely only gradually increase memory on their devices.

      • tankplanker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you were being cynical, you could say it was planned obsolescence and that when the new ai feature set rolls out that you have to get the new phone for them.

        • nous@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would say it is more so they can advertise a lower price. But then expect you to get the more expensive ones as the bare minimum is just not enough.

          • tankplanker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            For the base model yeah, but apple loves charging a packet for more memory so I don’t see it for the top of the range models. Would be typical for them to only offer 16gb with the increased storage as well, just to bump the price up

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty much what NVIDIA is doing with their GPUs. Refusing to provide adequate future proof amount of VRAM on their cards. That’s planned obsolescence in action.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And like Apple, Nvidia has no shortage of fanboys that insist the pitiful amounts of (V)RAM is enough. The marketing sway those two companies have is incredible.

          It’s a complete joke that Sapphire had an 8GB version of the R9 290X, what, 11 years ago or something? And yet Nvidia is still selling 8GB cards now, for exorbitant prices, and people lap it up.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a good comparison actually because Apple keeps saying that their ram is faster because it’s soldered (Which is true but only if you squint). I don’t really think it makes a difference because if you run out of space you still run out of space, the fact that you can access the limited space more quickly doesn’t really help.

      Well phone RAM also tends to be solded onto the board too so it’s a pretty good comparison.

  • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Golly, thanks Apple. It’s not like I can go buy a 256GB DIMM right now. 16GB what a joke.

  • nagaram@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t really care unless it has the same price point as the 8gb one.

    But we all know it won’t be.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think perhaps they realize the Apple magic has worn off and people have shockingly realized that 8 GB is in fact 8 GB.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let me know how many multiple thousands of dollars it’s going to cost for a MAX variant of the chip that can run three external monitors like it’s 2008.