• daddy32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    “each new connected TV platform user generates around $5 per quarter in data and advertising revenue.”

    Fuck me, this is the amount of money that’s enough motivation for them to ruin my experience and make me angry?

    I guess regular users have much higher tolerance to ads than me, but our home has a strict zero ad policy.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      A quick check online says that Samsung–which has about 25% of the global market–sold at least 1M OLED televisions and 8.3M QLED televisions in 2023. So, let’s say that they sell 9.5M televisions annually (I’m not sure if the numbers are global or US-only); that’s $190M in pure profit from advertising alone. For a billion-dollar plus corporation, that might seem small, but it’s certainly enough to get them to take notice.

      • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Samsung is also trying to make its ACR data more valuable for ad targeting, including through a deal signed in December with analytics firm Experian.

        This should add to their profits.

          • PlantJam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Experian has a program where you connect your bank account and they monitor transactions for things that could improve your credit by a couple points. I’m sure they’re not also harvesting the rest of your data to use in their analytics, right?

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That deserves to be its own headline. Something like “consumer electronics companies now conspiring with credit rating companies to surveil the public even more invasively.”

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s even better for them: those $190M are per-year for the lifetime of that TV.

        So if for simplification we said they also sold 9.5M TVs in 2021 and again in 2022, in the year of 2024 the will be making $570M from the TVs they sold in 2021, 2022 and 2023.

        If Samsung TVs are used in average for 10 years, in 2033 they will still be making money from TVs sold in 2024 and all the years in between. If their rate of sales remains 9.5M per year and how much they generate per quarter in data and advertising revenue from those TVs remains $5 (true, all big simplifications), by 2033 they will be making $1.90 BILLIONS from just this in addition to what they make from selling TVs.

        No wonder they’re full in on this monetization of users even whilst making user experience significantly worse - they would need to lose a huge number of sales due to this for it to not be worth it for them.

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve heard somewhere else that it’s a 50/50 split between the TV sales and ad revenue

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Roku is selling televisions at a loss with the intent on injecting ads based on whats on screen including detecting when you pause a show/game and injecting ads

        Patient Pending…

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was the sentence that stuck out to me the most in the whole article as well. Incredible how much is lost for so little. I imagine it’s like drug dealers though, maybe $5 for the first seller, then gets chopped up and cut again and sold for less and chopped up again…

      My question is, what are the alternatives? Other than finder older TVs without so much junkware and spyware, Are there open OS ROMs that can be loaded? Cracked firmware or debloated ROMs? I was very into Android’s launch 15 years ago and rode a train of options away from terrible stock ROMs from various OEMs; eventually privacy and simplicity becomes a selling point for OS after companies get through enshittifying it.

      • NullPointer@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “commercial display” is a worth while route to explore. They do cover a wider range of image quality and features, so it does take paying close attention to specifications.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My question is, what are the alternatives? Other than finder older TVs without so much junkware and spyware, Are there open OS ROMs that can be loaded? Cracked firmware or debloated ROMs? I was very into Android’s launch 15 years ago and rode a train of options away from terrible stock ROMs from various OEMs; eventually privacy and simplicity becomes a selling point for OS after companies get through enshittifying it.

        I’d like for us all to stop for a moment and appreciate just how thoroughly and comprehensively fucked up it is that Linux, which is what all these TVs are running and which is supposed to be Free Software (which exists for the express purpose of empowering the user’s right to control his device), has been subverted so goddamn badly!

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If a company could pay $5 a customer for a competitive edge in customer satisfaction over their competitors, they would. Either they are getting way more than that or there is some cartel/monopoly action going on in the market. Maybe they are playing the long game to introduce an ad free model at a premium.

      Still don’t see how nobody is undercutting existing players with ad free, smart tvs.

  • Sabata@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I revived the old LCD my grandparents were throwing out because it had good specs and no built in ads. Tossed in a new capacitor and it was good to go, otherwise I would just not own a TV.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I pity the poor fool who sets up their smart TV instead of just grabbing an HDMI cable and plugging in their computer.

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is beyond the capabilities of normies.

      My wife would agree with this:

      Media PC

      And I’ve got Plex running on an always on NAS.

      • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lmao that greentext was literally me before I finally set up arrstack. One of the best investments of my time, it has definitely paid off over many years of just having things automatically download.

        • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My Arr’s are unreliable. The trackers they search keep becoming unavailable for some reason. Flaresolver doesn’t seem to work with my VPN setup. Sometimes the file it finds to download turns out to be 54GB for a 1080p movie and I can’t figure out what the hell is going on there either. I haven’t got the time to look into Usenet any time soon. If I try to deploy something and it doesn’t work 100% right off the bat then the “wife acceptance factor” drops to zero, so I’ve got to be damn certain before I start tinkering.

          This comes off the back of a device on my network causing router issues and making Plex unreliable for a couple of weeks. By the time I diagnosed and fixed the issue, the damage was done and wife acceptance factor was lost.

    • ChillPill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ive been pretty happy so far with roku and blocking stuff with pihole, but every day I am more and more tempted to build a media pc…

      • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Currently trying that for the same reasons you are tempted. Roku was passable and even a good choice years ago and it’s on a precipitous race to the bottom now.

        Problem for me currently is finding a non windows solution that is navigable from a controller or remote is … tough. Steam, emulation station, Kodi all have reasonable interfaces but there seems to be a gap in a unified launcher solution (as well as a decent ‘app’ for accessing YouTube.) I really don’t want to spin up a single VM for each activity when they all in theory should play nice together.

        • TrenchcoatFullOfBats@belfry.rip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My solution to this problem is Jellyfin, fed by usenet-backed sonarr/radar and Tubesync to pull in YouTube channel subscriptions. Those are added to a Jellyfin library which is accessible right next to movies and tv shows.

          This is all through the Jellyfin app on a 2019 Nvidia Shield Pro. It’s a perfect couch-friendly setup. For just regular YouTube browsing, SmartTube can be installed on the Shield and on your phone. You can then cast to the SmartTube app on the Shield instead of to the YouTube app.

          • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It seems we have similar backend setups 🏴‍☠️

            I’ll need to dig into an android solution a bit - smarttube seems pretty nice but has no Linux version unfortunately.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is the way to go. I tried pihole using Samsung smart features, but if you block the telemetry eventually your apps stop working and you can’t get them working again without doing a factory reset with blocking down. It’s prohibitively a pain in the ass, taking hours every time YouTube stops working.

        Never had any issues with Roku on pihole.

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe one reason maybe that the software is so garbage it can’t handle not being able to submit all its logging information when otherwise the system thinks it’s online.

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That makes perfect sense and explains why you can’t fix it just by bypassing blocking temporarily and reinstalling the app.

  • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    My TV is a smart TV whose smart features I never, ever use because the first thing it does is switch to the input my Apple TV is on.

    Ironic really that the reason I chose an LG is because webOS seems less cunty than Android TV and whatever shit Samsung are offering. But I still never use it.

    • prince of space@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was pleasantly surprised that my Sony tv has a basic option so you can use it just as a screen. All smart stuff disabled.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      webOS seems less cunty than Android TV

      Every time they do an update, things get worse. But my last TV had some dying pixels, so there’s no going back.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Since at one point in the near future I’ll be shopping for a TV, is there such a thing as a good quality panel TV that is dumb? I intend to hook it up to a PC or a set top box. Alternatively, is there a smart TV that can be easily bootloader unlocked and rooted without consequences (similarly to how a Pixel phone can)? I realise this is even more niche than unlocking/rooting a phone, but still, someone might have ideas.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just bought a smart TV, updated the software, and disconnected it from the Internet, only allowing it access to our local Plex server. No ads and no stupid suggestions. It’s great.

    • ColonelPanic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Get a non-consumer TV if you can. They’re more expensive but are actually built to last, have way more features and you can swap in whatever compute board you want so you’re not stuck with an underpowered Android TV board.

      • a baby duck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m very interested in this. Any suggestions as far as specific models to look at, or where to source one without needing a fancy business vendor connection? Maybe a trustworthy review site to compare some options?

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was maybe 7 years ago now, but I bought a dumb Sceptre TV and it still works great. Was only $300 at the time.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My 10 year old TV which I watch 10 year old TV-series via HDMI from? I don’t think so.

    Tomorrow there’s going to be article about how my car spies on me as if that’s not 15 years old too. Or something about my office job that I don’t have.

    I’m becoming irrelevant. Not the target audience for anything.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That has also been my strategy (both for TVs and cars), but that doesn’t mean it’s reasonable to pretend that it’s a solution for the general public or that consumer-protection regulation isn’t both abundantly warranted and sorely needed.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am so genuinely surprised that there isnt a bigger movement to hack TVs to replace the OS’s on them with non-invasive open software alternatives.

    Especially with shit like this.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it’s not actually necessary; leave the TV isolated from the internet and use a set-top box (Apple TV, Shield, game console) as the media player.

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I agree, I think this solution is some nonsense. I bought a “TV” and paid for all the hardware and software that went into it, but I essentially have to use it as a monitor with my own hardware to escape the enshittification.

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I also agree, but I view it more as ‘I bought a TV, and that’s all I want it to be’.

          I don’t care about the built in software features foisted on me because I wanted an OLED panel; simply because they are going to be abandoned within 1-2 years, are powered by some anaemic chipset that is already multiple generations behind what is already available in my TV stand; and will likely end up as an attack vector to my network some period down the road.

          The article mentions that TV manufacturers make ~$5 a quarter from selling your data. So those ‘features’ aren’t even free, they come at the expense of your personal information, privacy and likely security as a result.

          So to quote a famous Dave Chapelle skit: “fuck ‘em, that’s why!”

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            simply because they are going to be abandoned within 1-2 years, are powered by some anaemic chipset that is already multiple generations behind what is already available in my TV stand; and will likely end up as an attack vector to my network some period down the road.

            You do realize all of that would probably cease being a problem if people were able to hack their TVs to install custom OS’s.

            all the spyware bullshit would also be gone with a custom OS.

            Literally every one of your gripes would be addressed and fixed by being able to hack your TV

            • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Custom OS isn’t going to address the anaemic hardware, nor do I think relying on open-source custom ROMs for a niche item is the best way to ensure any hardware-level vulnerabilities are covered.

              If you already have an Internet-connected device hooked up to your TV (eg. PlayStation); there is no need to connect another, especially when it provides an overall worse experience.

              Shit, a basic HTPC is infinitely better - using a Linux-based distribution (which will have a lot more support vs. a niche TV ROM), and it’ll be supported well beyond what the hardware could handle.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t give your TV the wifi password, kids. No, you don’t need to ‘finish setting up’ your TV; it works just fine as a dumb display.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Next time I have to get a new TV I think I’ll just get a large computer monitor and stream content via an old mini PC with Linux installed on it. Not an ideal solution, but I’m so tired of this invasive bullshit. At least that will cut out some of its vectors.

      After the recent Roku TOS fiasco I’m done with them. If manufacturers won’t give us a viable situation we will make one ourselves.

      Anyone know a good OS setup for reduced ad streaming? I know about Pi-Holes, but I’m talking about a way of actually streaming content (in addition to blocking ads at our near the router level).

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A way more than enough Mini PC for streaming content costs about $140 nowadays.

        It’s a direction I went into recently and was pleasently surprised how cheap it all is.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not mine. My TV’s my absolute digital bitch. It lets me do anything I want AND nothing, unlike Warren Buffet’s kids

  • Unlocalhost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Start buying commercial displays. Cost more but will be about as close to a dumb tv. You will have to provide your own smart device for apps …