I happened to click a link that took me to the associated twitter X account for something I was interested in and was greeted by not one, not two, but four modern day web popups.

I know it’s nothing new. I’ve got a couple of firefox plugins that are usually quite good at hiding this sort of nonsense, but I guess they failed me today (or, I shudder to think, there were even more that were blocked, and this is what got through)

What’s the worst new/not-signed-in user experience you’ve encountered recently?

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please unblock challenges.cloudflare.com to proceed
    (grumble, unblock, reload)

    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…
    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…
    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…
    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…
    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…

      • noodle (he/him)@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Privacy Pass will generate a number of random nonces that will be used as tokens

        British people making a double take

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Interesting. A quick look at the description makes me think it could help with the inconvenience problem, but probably not with the allowing javascript problem. Still, I’ll have to take a closer look. Thanks for the link.

        Edit: Turns out it requires installing a browser extension. From Cloudflare. No thanks, but I’ll give it another look if the protocol ever gets implemented by browsers.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You forgot:

      Click all the pictures of buses.
      (clicks)

      …spin…spin…spin…

      Click all the pictures of bicycles.
      (clicks)

      …spin…spin…spin…

      Click all the pictures of traffic lights.
      (clicks)

      …spin…spin…spin…

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t forget; I just chose to highlight Cloudflare’s awful captcha instead of Google’s awful captcha. :)

    • progandy@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      … Spin … Spin … Spin …

      … Remember that you turned off your VPN

      … Turn it on

      … CF: OK, only humans use VPN, no need to show the challenge

  • heavy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will say that the Google Auth prompt in particular is just this huge nuisance and a horrible experience. People should feel stupid for including it in their web experience.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a very hard time believing that these companies are unaware of how auful this shit makes their webpages.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      If this were a competent company, I’d say that they’re entirely aware of it and how fucking awful it is, but that there’s a mandate coming from somewhere that the page MUST include x, y and z and so they add x, y and z but usually try to at least make the site usable.

      This being Twitter, though, I’m sure it’s because a screaming man-child threw a sink at someone and told them to do it or they’ll be fired and so they did it in the most half-assed obnoxious way they could manage.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do a lot of my browsing from an iPhone 11. At least twice a day, a page will crash and reload halfway through whatever article I was trying to read. I get it’s a few generations old, but since when do you need state of the art tech to view what should be a static page.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s diminishing customer experience creep, except the company doesn’t understand what the user data means. They run A/B tests of different layouts, seeing what kind of feedback each gets to learn more about design choices and users. Each version should get its own feedback and then that data is compiled by data scientists into actionable feedback, things that can be done to improve the website in the direction the company thinks is an “improvement”.

      Twitter abandoned those data scientists with the initial layoffs. There is no one to tell them what works and what impacts the customer experience, which is why each time the internal question of “how do we open up for engagement?” they answer it the same way, “Use existing user bases by linking their account to Twitter.” The result is several login requests all looking for the same cookie.

      It’s lazy or inexperienced management. Knowing the type of person Elon hires, it’s probably both.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They know exactly. Once you create a Twitter account, consent to cookies and link your Google account (AKA give them all your data) you’ll never see these pop-ups again.

      Basically extortion.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you ever want to read anyone’s tweets somewhat chronologically or see someone’s latest tweet, you’re gonna create an account.

        Tweets as view on people’s profiles are totally scrambled (presumably to thwart LLM-feeding scrapers).

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone can make a good website. It takes a real engineer to make a horrible website that people will use just enough while suffering.

        • xavier666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Inspired from the quote “Any idiot can build a bridge that stands, but it takes an engineer to build a bridge that barely stands.”

          Source: Unknown

    • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I barely see them pop up, if they do it’s for a fraction of a second before a browser extension nukes them.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s kind of bothersome how almost blind I am to them now. I habitually find a way to close them without having to read or focus my eyes on anything. That’s not to say it isn’t still an annoyance.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Another term I seen in the context of healthcare is alert fatigue:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alarm_fatigue

        Alarm fatigue or alert fatigue describes how busy workers (in the case of health care, clinicians) become desensitized to safety alerts, and as a result ignore or fail to respond appropriately to such warnings.[1] Alarm fatigue occurs in many fields, including construction[2] and mining[3] (where vehicle back-up alarms sound so frequently that they often become senseless background noise), healthcare[4] (where electronic monitors tracking clinical information such as vital signs and blood glucose sound alarms so frequently, and often for such minor reasons, that they lose the urgency and attention-grabbing power which they are intended to have), and the nuclear power field. Like crying wolf, such false alarms rob the critical alarms of the importance they deserve. Alarm management and policy are critical to prevent alarm fatigue.

        • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Automation engineer here: alarm management is a hugely important part of making a plant operable.

          It is also a project that is never done, you must always review alarms that come in and see if they are providing useful information and what the operators are supposed to do with said information.

          If the operators are not supposed to do anything with the information, then what is the point of having the alarm?

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this was your webpage 15 years ago, you’d be almost certain that you’d been infected with malware.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was a screenshot I once saw of a Chinese netizen’s web browser in the late-2000’s, using Internet Explorer 6 and tonnes of third-party toolbars. I think I saw it back when Digg was still a thing. We’ve now reached the age where major websites are more cluttered with notifications than a malware-infected browser was 15 years ago, and where everybody is tracking everything that you do online.

      25 years ago, we legitimately drove RealNetworks into the ground for a lot less than what we’re allowing Google, Microsoft, Meta, X, etc to get away in the modern day.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really really do miss old school internet and feel kinda bad for people who never get to experience it. I know i sound like a cunt, and maybe it’s just nostalgia, but when the internet was bound to a computer and it was mainly “nerds” using it, it was such a better time. I remember a time where the internet was fast enough for pictures and small videos, but having your own picture somehow on the internet was witchcraft to me. Scanner, cameras who are digital whaaat? Now most of the internet is ads and pictures of people who i don’t give a shit about. People’s opinion, picture of people, fuck off bring back the time where the internet was either forums or someone’s weird website, where you only stumbled upon because you typed in a web adress i. The hopes it leads you somewhere.

      I had a girlfriend who was truly fascinated by the fact that i don’t have social media and that i’m not “on the internet” like she didn’t find me and my stupid face anywhere on the web. She was often wondering what i was doing on the internet if i don’t have social media, because that was the internet to her. Facebook, instagram, tiktok and youtube.

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        She was often wondering what i was doing on the internet if i don’t have social media, because that was the internet to her

        ~ shudders ~

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whenever I get to a webpage that looks a decade old (like most recently Ventoy) I get hit with a wave of nostalgia. Yeah, it might not look great or be very responsive to my actions, but my god does it feel great to just get thebinfo you need front and center.

  • Rose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did someone say… cookies?

    I can just tell that whenever Twitter’s user interface has weak attempts at humour, it was put there during the previous ownership, and that just makes me sad.

    Like when you delete your account the final message says “#Goodbye”, I was tearing up, thinking, like, shit, Musk really fucked everything up, did he?

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Musk really fucked everything up, did he?

      Other than no longer being able to use an app to access twitter, I haven’t noticed anything else changing for the worse. They even made the “media” tab into grid rather than list which was a welcome update.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How about just the userbase? I’d say that changed for the worse. A lot worse. And if you don’t think so, I hope you enjoy yelling about Jews at your next khakis and tiki torches march.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just set all the twitter and meta domains to localhost in my hosts file; no accidental clicks that go through for me :)

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The different popups just show how bad design the web is today.

    Ask cookie question is required.

    Login? Always create an account and proceed with all signup questions.

    Agreement? Read them 1 hour until you have understood everything.

    Webbrowser: can I get your location? And please the mic and video too!

    Finally, don’t forget the ads!

    • Emerald (she/her)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreement? Read them 1 hour until you have understood everything.

      I one time for fun (cause I’m insane) read the entire Windows license agreement, MSA (Microsoft Services Agreement), and privacy policy. It took me 1 hour and 45 minutes, I timed it.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Back on my Xbox 360 I decided to scroll through the agreement just to see how long it would take. I didn’t read it: I just held down the stick to see how long it would take.

        I gave up after 40 minutes of scrolling.

    • Spaniard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ask cookie question is required.

      Thank the European bureaucrats that don’t understand technology.

      • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it’s the website’s fault. You only need explicit consent if you’re tracking users beyond what your service obviously requires to function, the problem is these sites are stalking you.

        And if it’s even slightly harder to decline than to accept they’re likely not in compliance anyway so it’s definitely not the EU’s fault.

        • Spaniard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course it’s the website fault, but just like government don’t let companies do whatever they want (all the time) the have to force websites to not do certain things, a warning certainly doesn’t do much when people keep clicking “accept”.

          It’s the EU’s fault that there is that warning in the pages(which is what the OP is talking about in how clean websites are) a warning that doesn’t fix the real problem, just puts a sign on it.

          “WET FLOOR!” instead of fixing the leaking pipe.

            • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not just a warning, it’s also an option to reject.

              Some don’t give you an option, but actually have a much cleaner interface imo.

              Whether or not it’s better since you still have to click OK, some don’t let you reject them at all.

              • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you can’t reject, they either don’t need the pop-up, or they’re not in compliance with the law. Either way it’s in no way the fault of the lawmakers.

              • Nurgus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                If they don’t allow you to reject in two clicks then they’re violating the EU regulation.

                • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m aware of that, but I’m just pointing out many websites do not give you the consent options as stated above which imo are much more annoying.

      • graff@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but can we at least agree that 800 “partners” is a tad too much?

        • Spaniard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course, the problem is they shouldn’t have gone for a warning, they should have gone against the practice of having 800 partners, or do we think the average user clicks “refuse”?

          What they did is almost like nothing with extra steps.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve become quite picky about what sites I visit because of this, and it’s why I don’t like opening links. I know you can block this crap, but it’s seldom worth the effort.