• Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    We’re at a point where not only should the Internet be classified as a utility, so should Search.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oh look, more anticompetitive shenanigans.

    Break Google up. Bring the full force of antitrust down on them.

    Anything else is an unmitigated disaster waiting to happen.

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      For now.

      DDG gets search results from Bing, owned by Microsoft. And I wouldn’t be surprised if the later did the same as Google did.

      • Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s technically true, but it’s as misleading as saying they get their search results from Yandex. Their results are aggregated from several search engines, not just Bing. They also have their own web crawler, DuckDuckBot, which absolutely respects RobotRules.

        Edit: I’m told my information is out of date. No more Yandex because of Uncle Sam. Yahoo is just Bing now, so that index doesn’t count anymore. The bulk of the rest of their sources are largely inconsequential specialized search engines. Their sources page states that they “largely source from Bing”.

    • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      DuckDuckGo is just Bing. Which is uh… going from Google to Microsoft. Maybe not much better either

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Can someone explain why the fuck Google is pushing this so hard? Generative AI is not a general intelligence, and useless for concrete facts. Google has already demonstrated how shitty it is for information, and the people with the knowledge to work on the project have to know this.

    So why the fuck are they all full steam ahead on something that will always be useless for them?

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      AI is hype.
      They’ve recently signed a deal with Reddit for AI parsable data. Reddit reciprocated by allowing Google to be the only indexable search engine.
      Google now thinks it can do the same to literally everyone else.
      Googling is pretty damn mainstream.
      Don’t give Google your data, then don’t be included in googles search results. It’s like a flip of their previous trade with reddit, except it’s not a trade. It’s extortion.

      Reddit never gave Google traffic. They gave them content and data.
      And Google thinks it can withdraw traffic from other sites unless they get data in return.
      Literally extortion

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Their line goes up when they show they’re investing in AI, and it goes down when it looks like they’re falling behind or not investing enough in it.

      TBH, a lot of times I find myself interacting with ChatGPT instead of searching. It’s overhyped, but it’s useful.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve switched from DuckDuckGo to Ghostery Private search. I’ve been happier with the results than DDG.

    • pacoboyd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m using SEARXNG. It’s a search engine aggrigate and you can mix and match where you want your results to come from. It’s like using Google from a decade ago.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    As I understand it, this is only about using search results for summaries. If it’s just that and links to the source, I think it’s OK. What would be absolutely unacceptable is to use the web in general as training data for text and image generation (=write me a story about topic XY).

    • elrik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If it’s just that and links to the source, I think it’s OK.

      No one will click on the source, which means the only visitor to your site is Googlebot.

      What would be absolutely unacceptable is to use the web in general as training data for text and image generation.

      This has already happened and continues to happen.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        No one will click on the source, which means the only visitor to your site is Googlebot.

        That was the argument with the text snippets from news sources. Publishers successfully lobbied for laws to be passed in many countries that required search engine operators to pay fees. It backfired when Google removed the snippets from news sources that demanded fees from Google. Their visitors dropped by a massive amount, 90% or so, because those results were less attractive to Google users to click on than the nicer results with a snippet and a thumbnail. So “No one will click on the source” has already been disproven 10 or so years ago when the snippet issue was current. All those publishers have entered a free of charge licensing agreement with Google and the laws are still in place. So Google is fine, upstart search engines are not because those cannot pressure the publishers into free deals.

        This has already happened and continues to happen.

        With Gemini?

        • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Look at you, changing my mind with your logicking ways. I think information should be free anyway, but I thought media companies were being at least remotely genuine about the impact here. Forgot that lobbyists be lobbying and that Google wouldn’t have let them win if it didn’t benefit them.

  • Snowcano@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So how do I actually opt out? My website is just some personal hobby stuff on wordpress that only friends and family look at, I don’t need seo.

    • ColinHayhurst@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You should put these entries into your robots.txt file.

      To block the Google search crawler use for all of your site:

      User-agent: Googlebot

      Disallow: /

      To block the Google AI crawler use:

      User-agent: Google-Advanced

      Disallow: /

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I found ecosia faster and better results. Just letting you know in case you want to try

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ddg are shit too, search a name and they will relate it you locally even if you turn off regional results.

      Click a link and go back to results and they have changed.

      Ddg is enshittifying.

  • endofline@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s actually a good news. Maybe we’re able to revert the internet to the times before the Eternal September happened

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This will never happen. We might get some of the issues more regulated, and people may move away from others, but you can’t put the Furies back into the box. Things will change, but we will never have the early internet again.

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Please understand that this is the next ‘SEO’ shit.

    It was going to be this from the very start.

  • Kethal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Google is genuinely bad now. I switched to Ecosia which is just Bing with a simpler front end and they use their profits to plant trees. I don’t think Ecosia is particularly special though. Duck Duck Go, Bing whatever, they’re all better than Google.

    Whenever I set up a new computer then search for something, I’m always surprised at first seeing the awful layout and quality of the search results before I realize that I haven’t changed the default search from Google. It’s awful now. Seriously, how are people using it?

    My new favorite way to search is perplexity.ai. It’s an AI search tool that summarizes the loads of crap out there so you don’t need to read through the junk that people write. It provides sources, unlike using ChatGPT, which is incredibly valuable. All AIs make shit up, so having links to double check it is a must. Unlike Bing Chat, or whatever Microsoft calls it this week, you can ask follow up questions to home in on what you want.