CAIRO, Aug 15 (Reuters) - A Hamas guard who killed an Israeli hostage acted “in revenge” and against instructions after he heard news that his two children had been killed in an Israeli strike, a spokesperson for the group’s armed wing said on Thursday.

“The (Hamas) soldier assigned as a guard acted in a retaliatory manner, against instructions, after he received information that his two children were martyred in one of the massacres conducted by the enemy,” Abu Ubaida said on Telegram.

“The incident doesn’t represent our ethics and the instructions of our religion in dealing with captives. We will reinforce the instructions,” he added.

  • ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Keep in mind it’s always possible that they do this partly for PR. But at least they were transparent, even if they did in to look good. After all, next to Israel, anyone would look good.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No Israeli hostages so far suffered injuries from their guards while put in captivity. This incident was the exception.

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there probably were some? Pretty sure some released hostages described abuse and sexual assault.

        I hate Hamas, as a Palestinian, but Hamas fighters are not demons… they are not angels either.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cite the sexual abuse stuff from a reputable source, edit your comment, or catch a ban. You have 24 hours.

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Before I do that can I say this?

            I guess what you mean to ask is: was this part of the NYT report or not? Is that right?

            And also, I agree that much of that report was BS, but is that enough to discredit every single story in it? You may pretty well be denying rapes that did take place. I have no reason to deny the testimonies of some of these women. Hamas fighters are not angels and it would be quite naive to assume that no rape happened. What I said does not suggest that Hamas carries out systematic rape. Maybe that is a claim more worth your time to moderate than “some victims came out and spoke out about sexual assault during captivity.”

            But if this is how things roll in this community then just ban me 😉

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One started making claims of sexual assault 100 days after her release in the day 50 prisoner swap.

          It was mentioned released hostages are pressured by the Israeli government into making false confessions. They tell them if they lie there will be more pressure on Hamas to release other hostages.

          No physical signs of any abuse was found.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except for that were raped, but I guess since they’re Israeli, that doesn’t count?