• nexussapphire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Discord, slack, bitwarden, steam, Microsoft teams, visual studio code, balena etcher . Anyone else know of any electron apps or heavily modified version of chrome?😄

        • qupada@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Teams has switched to Microsoft’s own edition of the same concept, “Edge WebView2”. Now that Edge is just being Chrome wearing a rubber Scooby Doo mask, I don’t expect the differences are vast.

          Another fun iteration is Plex’s desktop client, which uses QtWebEngine… however surprise! still the Chromium engine underneath.

          Signal’s desktop app is plain old Electron though.

          Of the ones on your list, worth noting that Discord and Slack work fine with FirefoxPWA.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What pisses me off is how many websites don’t work right with Firefox now. There’s been several times where I’ve had issues with a site functioning on Firefox and had to switch to a chromium browser.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I read that most sites work just fine if you spoof your user agent to windows and standard chrome

        • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve had some sites bug out on Firefox that I’m pretty sure weren’t really related to Google or Microsoft in any way. I still use Firefox obviously, but it’s annoying.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The point was that some sites neglect to develop for Firefox, and simply tell Firefox users to get chrome instead. Meanwhile Firefox works in most cases perfectly fine without any doing on the website’s part if it is simply duped into believing that the firefox user is just a plain old chrome user as expected. Doesn’t work for everything, but almost.

      • drspod@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see this FUD all the time but nobody ever gives examples. Can you point to some specific sites that don’t work with Firefox?

        • lapping6596@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have issues with twitch. Given I only watch every 3 months for the POE announcement live stream, I just open brave for that one site. I have not tried to figure out if it’s my setup or not

        • Stoney_Logica1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Costco Travel login page never loads for me in Firefox. Specific sites my kids use for school don’t work either. I wouldn’t say it happens regularly, but often enough to be annoying.

        • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Walmart.com didn’t work for me on FF for about a week, and it did work on edge and chrome (still broken on FF when I disabled all my add ons). However, they fixed it and it works now. I think it was just a problem with the build of the website, and wasn’t intentional because it definitely works now.

          I think that’s what’s more likely - temp problems that could affect any browser until their web dev fixes it. Not anything malicious like intentionally blocking a browser.

          And then, it’s just Walmart. It’s nothing that really mattered.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          dialog boxes will just fuck off. I’ve never gotten webRTC to work properly, though that might be configuration skill issues, and or webRTC implementation skill issues, since it seems to only work on browser, not across two different ones.

          I’ve seen sites just load asinine layouts, borked kerning, completely fucked text handling. Just goofy shit.

          In some cases i’ve seen sites have no download buttons on firefox. I don’t know why, it’s confused me a few times though.

      • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I only have Chrome installed for the rare occasion where a site doesn’t work in Firefox. I feel like we’ve gone a bit backwards as of lately in building websites that are browser agnostic.

      • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This happens very rarely, but it does happen from time to time. When a website starts acting weird out of nowhere I keep a copy of Chrome installed just for that use and then promptly return to Firefox.

        • gsfraley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My insurance site (MyCigna) started working a couple months ago, but for years it failed to log in. It’s those types of contracted apps that seem to fail the most for me, like apps you’d see on a company intranet.

      • Caesium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a friend who sends me tiktoks that refuse to load with firefox on my phone. I consider it a blessing

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately for work I may have no choice:-(. Several of our daily work products I’ve tried on Firefox without success. Those also don’t have ads.

      I wish there were better alternatives. I may try out LibreWolf but I could not imagine it somehow being easier, though with enough effort put in the end result may be all that matters. Until the first update (possibly forced on the server end even if I don’t on mine) that breaks everything and I cannot do my work for the day, in which case I will absolutely go crawling back to Chrome, bc they have us by the short hairs there.:-(

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My company just plain old won’t install Firefox without a good reason.

        I’m stuck using chrome or edge. Once the ad block stops working on chrome, I move over.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My company just plain old won’t install Firefox without a good reason.

          If you have other potential employers in mind, the IT environment at your current employer and other potential employers is maybe one factor to keep in mind in making decisions as to where to work.

          There are some IT policies that are no-gos for me at potential employers, and I ask during the interview process.

        • _pete_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I really hate the corporate IT.

          I was at a job that was slowly transitioning from a medium sized company to a larger one, initially we were allowed just install and use whatever on our machines, but gradually IT started implementing policies where if we wanted to add something it had to go through a request system and usually it would be denied.

          As a software developer this was just infuriating, it would hold up work, force us to use shitty software (like Chrome and Edge) and there would often be fuck ups where installing a new version of software would require removal of the old one and installation of a new one - which would trigger the approval process again.

          Like - I get it - some people can’t be trusted, but we were some of the key devs for the companies product, we know what we’re doing.

          I was rather happy to leave that part of the company behind when I left.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chromium (Google Chrome’s base) is also open source.

          And yet, we’re still at a corporation’s mercy as to whether everything Chromium-based gets ruined by Google’s fuck-what-the-users-want policies. Like with Manifest V3. And JXL support. And extensions on mobile.

          • parpol@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can easily branch off from before manifest v3, and some browsers do. The problem with manifest v3 is that most users do not care. But let’s say chromium loses its ability to use tabs, you can bet it gets rolled back before it reaches news media.

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Users don’t know what the fuck Manifest is period. They just click the internet button. And for the longest time that meant the E with a loop around it. Now that means the multicolored circle.

              • John Richard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Users know that they want more security. MV3 makes a major of users that use Chrome safer from malicious extensions.

                • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I get what you’re saying, but the average person has no idea what it is, why they should care, or anything about it. All they see is Google making their extensions stop working. And when that includes some of the most popular extensions, that directly affect Googles revenue, they’re going to think that’s the reason.

                  The overwhelming majority of users get their extensions from the Chrome Web Store… Which Google has full control over. Users expect them to be blocking almost all malicious extensions before they’re even available to download.

              • John Richard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because it makes a majority of users that use Chrome much safer. Do you do any basic research? Do you need me to point you to the getting started guide?

                • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It doesn’t though. An adblocker is your VERY most important tool in a good security posture. Googles playing any users who ask for MV3 for fools

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m grateful for FF, but they also annoy me at times. Just little stuff probably not worth bitching about in detail. But also a peek at the potential for problems that you’re talking about.

        So of course I’ll bitch about it.

        I call it the “stop whatever you think you’d rather do right now and pay attention to our product” type shit.

        Imagine you have a combination wrench and whenever you take it out of the toolbox it starts yammering at you about how great of a wrench it is and all if its shiny features. Fucking ridiculous, right?

        So why do we tolerate software that does that?

        Way too much software does this pushy shit. Just stay outta my face and do your actual job, software.

        • Blaster M@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because people have the attention span of a goldfish and if you aren’t reminding them every 5 seconds of the features they have available they’ll forget they do in fact use them and then complain to support because they can’t spend 5 seconds on the help page.

          I say this, not in defense of mozilla, but in frustration at having to deal daily with these kinds of issues. You can put giant screen-size arrows on where to go / what single “do thie thing” button to press and people will still forget 5 seconds later.

          • Boozilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good point. That’s true, there is definitely that side of it. I think what you’re talking about is less obnoxious than the stuff that feels forced and make-the-boss-happy promotional. Push notifcations for no reason, etc. It’s a spectrum from necessary to uneccessary, and there’s too much of the latter IMO.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We’re so fucking used to ads we don’t even always realize we’re getting pushed propaganda

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firefox is a foundation, not a corporation. And I’m already using Fennec instead of the official release.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it’s strange just how readily the blinders go up wherever Mozilla is concerned. They’re a corp, just like any other; if they had the money and leverage, they’d be just as aggressive as Google. Have people already forgotten that time they laid off 200+ employees and then gave all the execs bonuses?

        E: Apparently y’all have forgotten. In 2021, Mozilla laid off a few hundred employees. CEO’s salary doubled that year. Fuck Mozilla, they’re no more your friends than Google or Microsoft; they’re the same evil, just smaller-scaled evil, is all.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is the first I’ve heard of LibreWolf. Is it compatible with Windows 7? And also, why is it good?

          • ivn@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            You really shouldn’t connect windows 7 to the internet.

          • parpol@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Librewolf is a fork of firefox that removes bloat and telemetry. You can “harden” firefox to do the same thing, but librewolf comes out of the box hardened.

            By the way, If you’re on win7 and don’t want to upgrade, Linux Mint might be a good alternative. It looks and feels similar but isn’t a security risk to connect to the internet.

          • -> @jrgd@lemmy.zip@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            https://librewolf.net/

            A summary from its site and known technical details:

            • no telemetry by default
            • includes uBlock Origin
            • has sane privacy-respecting defaults
            • prepackages arkenfox user.js
            • relatively well-maintained fork of Firefox that keeps up with upstream
            • No major controversies AFAIK

            As for Windows 7, nobody should really need to install Librewolf anyway on such a device. No device running Windows 7 should have access to the internet at this point. If you are asking about compatibility intending this use case, you have bigger problems to worry about than your choice of browser. If you just need to view HTML files graphically, even Internet Explorer or an older firefox ESR will do.

            • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Main features: … Continued support for NPAPI plugins like Silverlight, Adobe Flash and Java

              Picture this in your minds eye: a Windows 7 machine running a browser with still working Flash and Java plugins, connected to the internet in 2024.

              what do you see?

              i see a flourishing ecosystem of worms, viruses and rootkits, all trying to be the one species to get to be the one who does the most damage to the prey species, the common user.

              • trashcan@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sounds like an interesting experience to me. Admittedly I hadn’t looked that far into it. If Win 7 is a must I’d say just go with latest Firefox.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re overreacting. Firefox knows their users. I am a huge “stan” for Firefox, but I will delete it like a time traveller if they make it impossible to ignore ads. I will salt the earth and poop on Firefox’s grave and actively avoid it everywhere… However. If I’m wrong, there will be a Next Thing…

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I’m using Fennec, which doesn’t have that. But as long as it’s a flick of a switch to disable, I don’t really mind. Still a million times better than manifest v3.

      • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you use a DNS solutions you can block all the telemetry shit. Frankly FF has been phoning home in a lot of undesirable ways for many years even before this, like most browsers.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone else been having issues of not being able to load YouTube videos past the first few seconds on Firefox using ublock? I couldn’t find any recent information online. I don’t know if this is part of the war on ad blockers, or unrelated.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, what they’re saying is: Chrome will have severely decreased functionality and users will no longer be able to protect themselves from sketchy ads that contain scams, malware, and other nefarious bullshit (often hosted on Google’s own ad networks)?

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, we saw this coming. When Manifest v3 first talked about.

    Google an ad company are killing ad blockers. Yeah, that sounds right.

      • DivineDev@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish, but I don’t see it happening. Most people are just content with seeing ads absolutely everywhere, I just don’t get it.

        • Rolder@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wouldn’t mind the basic shit like a banner here or a side bar there. But the fucking obnoxious mid page ads, auto playing videos, scam link shit can go die in a hole.

          • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I used to not mind them, now I do. They over did it and I can’t go back. I will block ads untill I can’t and then I’ll probably climb a clock tower with an Uzi.

            I won’t really climb a clock tower with an Uzi.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      MV3 doesn’t kill ad blockers. uBOL (uBlock Origin Lite) blocks ads, is by the same author and uses MV3. The issue is MV2 made it way too easy for malicious browser extensions to do bad things, like read the content of every page you visit. MV3 makes it much harder for malicious browser extensions to do these things, but makes it harder to do things like intercept network requests.

      Some of these “features” that classic uBO used are available in MV3 but requires different permissions. Some of them could also be implemented with native messaging. The main uBO author though feels slighted by Google and went on a trash talking campaign against Google, and to be fair had a few good points. Anyway, most people on social media now care more about how Chromium and Firefox makes them feel now irregardless of facts. They think their emotions somehow are the same as facts.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue is MV2 made it way too easy for malicious browser extensions to do bad things, like read the content of every page you visit. MV3 makes it much harder for malicious browser extensions to do these things, but makes it harder to do things like intercept network requests.

        Then allow a savvy user to choose to keep MV2 mode via an opt-in control instead of depreciating years of hard work by non-malicious extension authors. uBlock Origin is, in fact, the ONLY browser extension I use in Chrome, as Firefox is my main browser.

  • ArugulaZ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gee, what a shame. Good think I switched to FireFox. Hey, does anyone know how to make chat work on FireFox?

  • Lightsong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Firefox but when I watch twitch or wherever, I need Google chrome’s live caption to see what streamers say.

    Firefox please get this feature asap. So I can delete Google chrome for good.