• jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, it’s probably more important to make sure we don’t have child porn generation machines available to anyone online.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think training your own image generator on existing child porn is probably beyond most high schoolers. I’d be happy if at least commercial options were held responsible for distributing generated CP, which is already illegal BTW.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think the models are trained on CP. They’re likely trained on widely-available porn.

          • zurohki@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This. If you ask an image generator for a bed in the shape of a pineapple, it probably has no pineapple-shaped beds in its training data but it has pineapples and beds and can mash the concepts together.