• smnwcj@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    We really need to tax energy used by GPU-burning projects differently. AI training, blockchain, whatever. Such a wasteful endeavour.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        All industrial users pay lower, because they’re able to apply economies of scale and locate themselves in places with lower power costs. Some of them are big enough that the utilities will build power lines and plants specifically to make electricity cheaper. It’s not just a matter of “oh, they’re rich, so we’ll charge them less.”

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      No significant blockchains use GPUs any more. As for AI training, that produces AIs. It’s not wasteful.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I use AIs for a variety of productive purposes. You may not, and that’s fine, but that’s just you. You can’t dismiss anything that you personally don’t have a use for as “wasteful.”

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Okay, so? NFTs aren’t AI, and they don’t use proof-of-work any more for that matter.

              • slurpyslop@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                I use NFTs for a variety of productive purposes. You may not, and that’s fine, but that’s just you. You can’t dismiss anything that you personally don’t have a use for as “wasteful.”

                • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I wasn’t. I pointed out that no significant blockchains used GPUs (especially not Ethereum, the main NFT-supporting blockchain, which has transitioned to proof-of-stake instead of proof-of-work). That puts them outside the question of “wastefulness” altogether, and irrelevant to the subject at hand.

    • inspxtr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      you should try to ask the same question using xAI / Grok if possible. May also ask ChatGPT about Altman as well

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    He’s calling it a gigafactory? He already has a gigafactory, and it’s actually a factory.

    Just call it a datacenter, because that’s what you’re building.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, it seems like Musk’s innovation is calling it GIGAFACTORY!

        Obligatory exclamation point.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    So what everyone else has been doing but smaller while calling it giga. Let me buy some TSLA shares.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, but that’s already priced in. Anyone wanting to get on the Nvidia train for the AI push is a few years too late. Honestly, I expect it to be overpriced, with AI hype boosting it over the value it should have.

        • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you wanna bet that AMD accelerators become a viable alternative while the bubble is still going, maybe bet on them. It’s all gambling, in the end.

  • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    Him and everyone else. The only problem is that NVIDIA can only build them so fast, and there’s only so much high power datacenter space.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Makes very little sense to downvote this, there are several points where Musk could go to jail. Both regarding fraud towards investors and also customers.

          Probably the most obvious case is that Musk claimed in 2019 it would be possible to earn money on owning a Tesla, because it would be able to be used as a robo taxi by 2020.
          But Full self driving required for Robo Taxi is still nowhere near ready.

          He also claimed that Tesla would NOT depreciate like other cars, because they are the most future proof cars you can buy.
          But Tesla cars have since depreciated faster than almost any other car, in part because of Tesla price reductions, and in part because the promises came to nothing.

          There could also be situations considering Hyperloop, where he promised faster and cheaper public transport, and that it was actually easy to make. But the projects he has accepted all came to nothing.

          There may be cases on his promises every year since 2016 that Tesla cars would be capable of FSD next year.

          He has also made wildly exaggerated promises about SpaceX, that may constitute fraud towards investors. Starting a Mars base 2022, and manned missions 2024, I don’t recall any SpaceX Mars missions.

          People have invested their pensions on these false claims, and at some point, I have no doubt they will result in lawsuits, at least some of them.

          • VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Thanks much for this. Frankly it’s the Stochastiv Terrorism (buying twitter, banning accounts handpicked by the Andy Gno type, iirc, promoting anti-freedom-from/of-gender types, promoting zionists and anti-semites (but I repeat myself)…the general trend of amplifying danger for folks who whom the world is already primed to scapegoat or antagonize. It’s harmed journalism and is moving the electoral overton window to the far-right.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yes it does seem the far right is doing better than they should be, this is unfortunately also the case in Europe. And it has very much to do with systematic control and manipulation of both normal media and social media by the 1%.

        • remer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thank you for elaborating. Surely any credible allegations are being pursued by the DOJ and you can reference them.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            While this wasn’t treated as fraud, Musk did lose his $55 billion bonus as deemed an insider job, where Musk controlled the board to the detriment of other shareholders. Here (Denmark) we had a similar case in principle but by a majority shareholder (although much smaller), that resulted in 7 year jail time for the CEO/Stock majority holder that did it.

            https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4438387-judge-rules-musk-must-give-up-tesla-compensation-worth-billions/

            Why musk isn’t in jail for this IDK, but IMO he should be, and by better standards he would be.

            • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Because he’s the pride and token of US (and their greenwashing). AND the US already poured too much of the taxpayers’ money into SpaceX & Tesla. To announce that they basically got granny-scammed by one loudmouth would be to destroy your international cred.

            • remer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m not the one committing libel my dude. You clearly can’t back up your feelings. You could have just mentioned something like FSD but apparently it’s easier to lash out.

              • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 years ago

                I can back up my feelings, I just don’t have to. Not when I’m “required to present proof” by a rando with an internet access.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    With what money? SpaceX is the only company with any kind of steady revenue to its name and that’s only because the US government subsidised it

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m guessing from new investors. That still believe Enron Musk groks it.

      In a presentation for investors, Elon Musk revealed that the new supercomputer will use as many as 100,000 Nvidia’s H100 GPUs

      • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        And how is he going to get all those cards? Does he know that all production is reserved for the big boys?

    • blusterydayve26@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      H100 isn’t $40, it’s $40,000. You’re making the Bloomberg Mistake: it costs $4,000,000,000 - four billion.

      I can’t wait to see what clownshoes nonsense way he absolutely fucks this one up, but that’ll take a lot of liquidity he probably doesn’t have access to unless he gets the $45bn Tesla payout.

      • sushibowl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        xAI just finished up a funding round worth $6bn, he doesn’t need to use his own money. It’s the usual bunch of VC funds: Fidelity Sequoia, Kingdom Holdings (that’s a Saudi fund).

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    You know, The Infinite Monkey Theorem states that if you chain a room full of monkeys to typewriters and let them all beat the keys at random, for an infinite amount of time, they will . . . eventually . . . through sheer random chance . . . produce the comple works of William Shakespeare. Maybe in 10 trillion years or so. THIS is current state of “AI.”

    What Musk is proposing is like building an army of very expensive, very wasteful fusion-powered robots to beat the monkeys in the hope that the monkeys will work just a little bit faster.