• penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve read somewhere that iMessage wasn’t considered “big enough” to be considerate a monopoly. Which is bullshit if you ask me.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      2 years ago

      Kinda true in Europe though. Don’t know anyone who uses iMessage, it’s pretty much irrelevant. I know the situation in the US is quite different, but ultimately they don’t regulate for the US market.

    • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its only big in the US, most of the planet only sees iMessage as that borderline useless app Apple bundles in their phones.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s annoying as fuck when I message my wife a video of our kids, it looks like dog shit on her iPhone. I have to instead send it on Whatsapp or signal. I hate apple

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s because you’re using SMS, that’s not the fault of the messaging app. Using a third party messaging app is the correct way to go, it’s encrypted, supports group chats, and bigger messages.

          • So does iMessage, to be fair. The problem is that Apple decided not build clients for alternative platforms, but the app itself is quite competent.

            Hopefully Apple can convince the telco people to implement E2EE in RCS (though good luck getting that through with wiretap laws all around the world, lol) so there’s some kind of cross-platform standard here. Apple is going to implement RCS to save Americans from blurry videos at the very least, but it won’t add Google’s proprietary encryption standard.

            • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Hopefully not RCS, but maybe Matrix or the Signal protocol, as RCS is entirely controlled by Google and there aren’t any FOSS clients.

              • RCS is controlled by GSMA, not Google. I’m sure they’ll welcome Google’s extensions, but Google doesn’t get to decide.

                Google can try to do the same thing they did to XMPP, but then they get the same “Androids don’t receive our pictures” problem that’s driving teenagers to buy iOS in the USA in the first place.

                • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Specification may be not controlled by Google, but the single available client implementation is controlled by Google and almost all carriers are delegating managing their RCS servers to Google.

                  While XMPP or Matrix server you can host even on your LAN network between two computers.

    • Hirom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Apple would still feel pressure to add interoperability if all other big players do. iMessage would have a competitive disadvantage if it’s the only one where users are unable to message the rest of the world.

        • Hirom@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes. Still, it would be harder to not give a f if others walled gardens open up, and iMessage get disadvantaged by that wall.

          It’s as if iPhones were only able to make calls to other iPhones. Whereas all other devices where able to make calls to any device from any other vendor.