wagesj45

And hundreds of thousands of years of evolution pre-training the base model that their experience was layered on top of.

Proxmox on physical servers hosting a variety of vanilla Debian installations. I have a physical router running pfsense as well as two HP miniservers running OpenMediaVault.

That’s never stopped us before.

The problems I’ve had with my RPis have all revolved around the fragility of their SD storage. I got burned one too many times trying to host something important in my house with these things, just for them to get corrupted and lose everything. Backing up these systems was its own nightmare, which failed as much as it succeeded.

If they could force you to pay a royalty every time you so much as thought of a book you once read, they’d do it in a heartbeat.

Tomato, tomato, as far as they’re concerned.

Judging by the crash test videos of the Cybertruck, this does not surprise me in the least. Why make cars safe when you could just not save some money?

You mean Chromium Brave Edition?

This has amused me. Thank you for the amusement.

You’re right, but what would the internet be without a little pedantry and ignoring the point of the post? :D

Wikipedia just summarizes the primary sources.

Technically, I think they only allow primary sources to be referenced if supported by a secondary source. They have weird and complex rules around that,

And the article is making the case explicitly that this is bad. He is saying that 9/11 brought about terrible actions from us and that we should learn lessons and not repeat our mistakes. He’s actually trying to convince the reader that we should not “swallow” another genocide.

FYI, Publii is really good. It supports importing existing WordPress blogs and has a familiar interface. Great for those that don’t need built in comments and can use something like Cactus (if you like Matrix).

You keep describing it as jingoistic and the author didn’t claim or even appear to be heavily nationalistic and in fact appeared quite the opposite.

…did you read the post? It feels like you did not read the content of the post.

I think we just have to accept that marketing has to dumb down and generalize for the mass market.

So they’re using our data and also getting paid for it

Yeah? Isn’t that the point of paying for a music service? I pay, they give me access to music and curate it in a way that would be enjoyable to me. How could they do that without some information about me? This is a prime example of what a company should use your data for.

This logic is really sending me, man.

If it’s a neural network doing it, then that’s fine.

If GM thinks they have the rizz that Tesla has/had they are absolutely insane.

When I was purchasing my car about 6 years ago I was sure I was going to for for a Nissan, as I currently had one that I loved. But they didn’t offer any cars with Android Auto support and that was a deal breaker. It is a make or break thing for me, and I suspect as more and more people adopt it, it will be for them too. We might see this kind of pressure delayed, as car purchases don’t happen every year for most people, and the CarPlay/Android Auto software has really only become quality must-have software within the past few years. Yet, as people approach the time to purchase a new car, I believe the pressure on automakers to integrate these technologies will intensify.