So, offering support to a sovereign state is not encroaching on a neighbouring state’s borders.
However, annexing a bordering sovereign state is per definition encroaching on another state’s borders.
Even if you do it with unmarked soldiers and officially state it’s totally not you doing it.
Doing the same thing openly, 8 years later with full military force is also illegal.
Correctly predicting an invasion doesn’t justify it.
Reports from the rest of the world:
Russian attack kills 3 in Ukraine’s city of Dnipro, governor says
Moscow’s troops launched 235 drones and 27 missiles, damaging residential and commercial buildings and causing fires, the Ukrainian Air Force said. It said in a statement that 10 missiles and 25 attack drones hit nine sites. The rest of the drones and missiles were brought down, the Air Force said.
https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/russian-attack-kills-3-ukraines-city-dnipro-governor-says-2025-07-26/
Right populist leaning german news outlet welt.de says:
In der Stadt Dnipro und Umgebung seien drei Menschen getötet und sechs verletzt worden.
In the City Dnipro and it’s surroundings three people have allegedly been killed and six have been injured.
https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article68849d400e680a76f4e962b4/krieg-in-der-ukraine-charkiw-meldet-fast-drei-stunden-lang-dauerbeschuss-von-russischen-raketen-und-drohnen.html
edit: lmaooo he immediately downvoted me in less than a minute
Left of the center lmao. It’s not even like theyre crazy world changing communists. They just want proportional taxation, social services and ppl to afford food and housing. Unfathomable utopia i know.
Lobbyism is a cancer on democracy i swear
The concentrated stupidity between the lawmakers pulling these moves and the dummies eating that shit up
despite surviving an impeachment vote thanks to his own party, the People’s Power Party (PPP) boycotting.
So the whole party is and was in on it? Trying to put the next pres into place to try again or what
Yeah couple of options here:
and climate-change causes
must be a terrorist if he believes in science /s
Fucking digging through the “person of interest”'s social media account, all but doxxing his entire life without any confirmation that he’s the guy.
Sensationalist shitrag
Why even bring up random gifs from a github repo??
Just wanna point out that in this initial reply to the comment tree, you did the exact same thing I just called you out on:
Misrepresenting (or to not assume malice, misREADING) another comment to then spin your entire narrative around that error.
They said:
Putin doesn’t mind how many Russians will die
You base your retort on:
If Putin doesn’t care how many Ukrainians die
“this already shows you are terrible at reading. How am I supposed to expect you to treat anything else I show you seriously when you cannot even read your own material?”
“claim” is the key word in that sentence.
Same as “re-education” of any type.
Its a concerted effort to eradicate the local culture and assimilate the youths.
Its cultural genocide
The response by the Lebanese armed forces came after two of their soldiers were killed in Israeli attacks. In the first attack, the Israeli army attacked a Red Cross convoy, leaving four medics injured during a recovery operation in Taybeh-Marjayoun. The second Israeli attack occurred in the Bint Jbeil area.
Weren’t they totally only targeting terrorists?
The one thing that makes me most certain that criticism of israeli actions in gaza are warranted is how any form of discussion is labelled “vile hatred” immediately.
I know propaganda exists and i really hope some things get exaggerated or are made up, but no sane person or government would react like that to legitimate concern for civillians.
Then russia invades further, kills more civvies and pushes further into european territory. Whats the question?
Bruv youre not saying anything youre asking open leading questions.
And then you ask different questions when you dislike the answers. That’s exactly what moving goalposts means. I understand you love russia but please read and think before you reply.
shooting live rounds into a crowd of (presumably) unarmed or lightly armed (think sticks, stones) protesters is a vile, inexcusable failure or intentional executions to retain the status quo.
A police force with tear gas, water cannons and riot gear has zero reasons to resort to live ammunition.