• 0 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 1st, 2024

help-circle
  • It’s the never ending battle between what’s secure and what’s practical. In order to have widespread adoption, it has to be easy. In order to be secure it requires layers of complication.

    It’s a yin/yang battle.

    A bank vault with walls 2 feet thick, 24/7 surveillance and requiring a two key unlock mechanism is secure compared to a house door lock on a regular suburban bungalow, but is it very practical?

    The level of digital security generally attainable is limited by how likely someone is to use it.

    2FA using keys is the closest I’ve seen to a happy medium, but it has to be implemented correctly. If the private keys are sitting on a cloud server somewhere and it gets hacked, is it more secure? Maybe not.

    Just like real defence, the walls are only as good as the foundation or weakest point.






  • I concur. Podman is superior in my opinion. It’s more secure by default (rootless containers) and can do pretty much everything docker can do naively (you can literally alias docker to podman in your shell and it will work)

    It’s not as easy to find info on some of the systemd specific stuff (Quadlets), but once you figure that out, it’s pretty amazing.

    I ended up making up my own scripts to allow me to create new system users, pre-loaded with aliases and shortcut functions to make my life easier ( automatic quadlet container file generation, pre-set network rules, etc), but it is not required.

    All the info is there, but starting out it can be a bit overwhelming.

    My containers are pretty much self sufficient now. I just intervene when something needs major updating or config changes