Some middle-aged guy on the Internet. Seen a lot of it, occasionally regurgitates it, trying to be amusing and informative.
Lurked Digg until v4. Commented on Reddit (same username) until it went full Musk.
Was on kbin.social but created this profile on kbin.run during the first week-long outage.
Other Adjectives: Neurodivergent; Nerd; Broken; British; Ally; Leftish
To stick with the analogy, this is like putting a small CPU inside the bottle, so the main CPU<->RAM bottleneck isn’t used as often. That said, any CPU, within RAM silicon or not, is still going to have to shift data around, so there will still be choke points, they’ll just be quicker. Theoretically.
Thinking about it, this is kind of the counterpart to CPUs having an on-chip cache of memory.
Edit: counterpoint to counterpart
See also: How a remote Kansas location keeps getting visited by the FBI
Disclaimer - the above is an 8-year-old story. No idea if the three-letter agencies are still turning up there, but I wouldn’t be surprised.
No, but SearX does similar things. I’ve been learning about Kagi recently, and as far as I can tell, they don’t index pages on their own, they just use APIs provided by the real search engines.
Kagi is a search aggregator, so those results are from Google.
Hopefully archive.org have measures in place to stop people from yanking all their data too quickly. As least not without a hefty donation or something. As a user it can chug a bit, and I’m hoping that’s the rate-limiting I’m talking about and not that they’re swamped.
Yep. I remember - despite the fact it was old even then - building and connecting a Win 3.11 machine to a TCP/IP office network as a proof of concept back in 2000 or so. I might have even installed Netscape on it. I don’t remember clearly now, but I assume the parts for the computer came out of the spares pile, and were soon recycled back into other machines.
It’s a bit easier to not use a website than it is to leave a country.
A combination of browser settings and exceptionally rare usage of short link providers - as creator or user - means I’m not completely sure about this, but … were they putting ads on the short links somehow?
Because I figure if they weren’t they should have tried that.
And if they were, how expensive is running a short link service anyway? This feels like rummaging around in the sofa for loose change. Smacks of desperation.
YouTube have been doing that sort of thing for years though. Do you remember the push to have everyone switch to a Google+ account with a real name attached?
They’d ask if you wanted to do the aforementioned, and if you said no, they responded “OK we’ll ask again later.”
No “Never ask me this again.”, just the implicit “f–k you, we’re going to pester you with this over and over again until you sign up.”
After they got enough sign-ups they quit asking. And then Google+ went down the Swanee, so they relented and decided that maybe it was OK for people to have pseudonymous accounts after all. It only took years for that to happen.
Can’t see how short-form content is going to fail in the same way, so there’ll be nothing here to teach them the lesson again.
“And lo the corporations built their own navy, or maybe bought the US Navy which amounted to the same thing…”
If we tried this in the UK with someone like, say, the late David Coleman, I’m not entirely sure anyone who remembers him would be able to distinguish - other than, as I said, the knowledge that he’s been gone for quite some time now.
Coleman, was considered a go-to commentator for decades despite being gaffe-prone even at the best of times. He was occasionally oblivious and apparently lacking any self-awareness too. (He did kind of learn to laugh at himself though and was a good, well, sport, about it all.)
Sounds very AI to me. Come to think of it, he may even have been kept around precisely because of the entertainment value.
I assume that Al Michaels is not of this bizarre calibre and it wouldn’t take long for people to notice.
That’s called “time to get a new job.”
Before I came in here, I assumed that’s what “or else” meant, and I’m still not sure it doesn’t mean that.
One downside to this is that $10 is worth more to one person than it is to another, and I can’t see how that can be fixed.
Feeling daring? If you have to buy the software anyway, invoice the government department the price of the software.
They did. See “netflitwitter”.
Borrowing from something I saw elsewhere: Set up a task / cron job / whatever it is on your OS that takes a full screenshot every minute and then sends it to Microsoft’s AI team.
Or save it to a drive or something, I’m not the boss here. And neither is Microsoft.
“This wouldn’t have happened if you had told me where you keep the f**king catnip, Susan!”
The upshot of your comment with the current situation is: Windows users want someone to wipe their a*** for them and are increasingly OK with the wiping hand doing other things it feels like at the same time.
At least with Linux’s rough paper, it’s my own damn hand.
Depends on the size of the company.
Save your effort. What’s already there is there forever. They can just roll back your comments, or even, if they’re in the mood for it, make it appear under an entirely different username.
The only way to win is not give them any more. And that fight is already under way. They’ve already started recommending old comments after new ones because the quality isn’t as high any more.
Think about it: The only people who contribute to Reddit now are the clueless and the sort of people who have willingly stayed.
I like to imagine Spez stomping around saying “Hmph! Hmph! It’s not fair! Why did they all leave?! They’re stealing my revenue by not giving me anything for free”. I mean, he’s probably not doing that, but I do like to imagine it.