

I love “unimplemented!”
I love “unimplemented!”
No, it’s about the legitimization of law, the legitimization of use of power, checks and balances and unconditional human rights.
Usually codified by lawy not prosecuted as “immoral behaviour” as such. Although if you look at recent anti-abortion legislation in the US it is intentionally vague. That shifts some burden of interpretation to the executive branch and is a sign of authoritarianism I’d say.
It absolutely does imo, it legitimises itself through an appeal to an underlying moral framework.
Yes, but very indirectly. We don’t have a “moral police”, but one that enforces laws which are, as you say, legitimized by the people as a sovereign.
So you don’t see police stopping people on “moral grounds” in some vague interpretation.
the state maintains that this is a moral and legitimate use of force: that it has the authority to do this.
I don’t necessarily agree with “moral”. In western democracies laws and use of force doesn’t legitimize itself by a call to morality usually. Just using some kind of authority, doesn’t make a government authoritarian by any common definition of the word.
Hot take. What’s the eli5 behind the idea?
There’s dozens of us
If you heat things electrically you still generate waste heat. Think electrical stove and its bigger industrial counterparts.
Yes of course, but a lot of energy is currently also used for heating things in cooking steel, chemical industry, concrete, etc. Those processes need energy as heat and directly produce waste heat. I agree it’s probably still significant. It’s just wrong to reduce energy consumption to “making things move”.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but electrifying a process doesn’t automatically make it not produce waste heat, right?
It’s still loading the page internally to extract the video link. I don’t think newpipe after that looks different than say a smart tv,. So it’s up to YouTube to do the counting.
Some ai models perform at 4 bit resolution. Maybe there’s a chance?
There was a study on Facebook that showed that they could predict with between 80-95% accuracy (or some crazy number like that) your gender, orientation, politics, and so on just based on your public likes. That was ten years ago at least. What is this even showing?
Advocates diabolo: that a large language model can do it without extra training, I guess. The Facebook study presented a statistical model on “like space” while this study relies on text alone, a much less structured type of input.
I’m not saying it’s a good study. Just pointing out some differences.
Yeah, sure. Doesn’t change the other point
Video Just has fundamentally different hosting cost for processing and bandwidth. Amongst the big streaming providers only Netflix makes a profit. Twitch is not profitable, either.
ComicRack is a fantastic app for reading and managing a collection across devices
There’s embedded rust for a few platforms. Using it on ESPs is fun