

Elle expire à la fin de l’année


Elle expire à la fin de l’année


Qu’est-ce que tu me baragouines toi


Les batteries, les détergents, les capotes et plein d’autre choses ont une application utile. La cigarette et les chewing-gums, pourquoi pas les interdire effectivement, on en serait pas le premier pays à le faire


La question c’est pas juste la santé des fumeurs.
Chaque clope qui se retrouve dans la nature, c’est potentiellement 500 litres d’eau polluée et des produits chimiques qui empoisonnent notre sol. Rien que pour ça on devrait interdire cette merde à la vente, ou au moins être extrêmement sévère.


Wether you like it or not, some people don’t have the luxury to stop fighting, even more so right now with so-called democratic governments that brutalize, lock up and torture people for their opinions, their sexuality or their skin color.
Ignore these debates if you wish, and disconnect from social networks if you need to rest. But don’t call for people to stop fighting when their very existence is put at risk by people like DHH, that Framework decided to support.


AV1 is not an encoder. If you watch AV1 encoded videos, you’re using AV1.


That happens all the time. There’s no way to guarantee that it won’t happen with any codec or really with anything.
Yes, so there’s no reason to hold back on releasing updates, since it could very well happen on AV1.
It is very expensive to defend against even when the claim is bogus.
The principle behind AV1, once again, is to have a modern codec that is out of reach from patent trolls. Those who are part of the AOM consortium, which developed this codec, have all contractually agreed to unconditionally license all patents they hold that are necessary for the implementation of the codec.
And those who are not part of the consortium and who would like to claim patents relating to the AV1 or AV2 codecs would have to face the legal teams of the companies part of said consortium, including Amazon, Alibaba, Adobe, AMD, Cisco, Google, Intel, Microsoft, Mozilla Foundation, ARM, Huawei, Samsung, Tencent, Meta, Nvidia, Apple, Netflix, and other large companies.
The AV1 and AV2 codecs, after perhaps H264, are the most secure codecs available today in terms of patent trolls. Nobody has both the will and the means to attack it.


AV1 and AV2 are both patent free and nobody will be able to grab them to be a patent troll, that’s the point. Maybe you should start educating yourself a bit on the subject before ranting?


No, Jellyseerr is a selfhosted webapp where you request movies and shows, which will be searched and downloaded by your configured Sonarr/Radarr, which will populate your Jellyfin.
You can see it as a user-friendly Sonarr+Radarr front-end, that you can sync with Jellyfin users, so they can go and request content directly without you manually adding things in Radarr/Sonarr.
Merci, c’est fait !


Quelqu’un pour partager l’article, siouplé ?


Which laws? There are none written yet.


Private platforms owned by billionaires =/= Free speech
Protecting children from these cesspools is a matter of sanitary measures. I would even go further and just kill Meta, Twitter, Tiktok and the likes just for being major platforms for espionage, disinformation, and democratic destabilization, particularly used by hostile foreign powers.
I already answered your second paragraph: Jellyfin holds no sensible data.
And there is no central server gathering data from all users, an hacker would need to find and break in multiple Jellyfin instances, to get useless data from 1 to maybe 10 users each time.
And Plex is not easier to install and secure than Jellyfin.
My Jellyfin is behind a Crowdsec + Cloudflare proxy with geoblocking and other protections + Reverse Proxy with additional protections, in a rootless Docker container with no access to the Docker socket, and has only access to a mounted folder which contains just downloaded movies and shows. The effort to break in is high, the reward very low.
But the most important difference between Jellyfin and Plex is that neither Jellyfin devs nor Jellyfin instances have any personal or credit card information from their users, and therefore are way less a problem if hacked into.


but right now renewable energy is by far cheaper and faster to build than nuclear energy.
No. Building a solar or wind plant is cheaper and faster than building a nuclear plant, sure, but that’s not what we’re aiming for. The goal is to decarbonize electricity by phasing out fossils.
Replacing all fossil-based electricity production nationwide is quite cheap for nuclear when done right (e.g. France, planning for decades and multiple reactors at once, while actually politically supporting your industry, instead of throwing a project once in a while and letting it fight in courts by itself against NIMBY and anti-nuclears).
Replacing fossils with solar and wind power is science fiction. There is not a single country in the world that has decarbonized its electricity without significant decarbonized and controllable electricity capacities, or to name them: hydro or nuclear. Except that you just can’t build hydro anywhere, and most countries’ capacities are limited.
You can’t claim that solar and wind are cheaper than nuclear, because solar and wind just can’t do what nuclear can, and can at best be complementary to other controllable power sources.


Nuclear has never been cost-efficient, it’s just that the costs have been buried in state subsidies to the industry and its supply chain.
A lie repeated again and again.
French Cour des Comptes has released a report, back in 2012, the costs of the french nuclear fleet, everything included: 121 billions of euros between 1960 and 2010.
2,4 billions a year. To provide decarbonized and reliable electricity for decades.
To put in perspective, Germany is more than a trillion of euros in for their Energiewende, or about 40 billions of euros a year for ~25 years, and they still have one of the costliest and dirtiest electricity or Europe, while still not being close to stop coal and having no plan to get out of gas.
And for more perspective, EDF had 118 billions of dollars of revenues in 2024, mostly coming from nuclear, and 11 billions of net results, including the payback of the interests of the debt that the french government imposed on EDF.
Anyone claiming nuclear has never been or can’t be profitable or cost-efficient is either uneducated or a liar.
When done right, nuclear is profitable as fuck, that’s empirically proved.


Which is an ecological measure, not a technical one, and can be circumvented by existing technologies like cooling towers
just $10/
monthyear
Euh la majeure partie de la dette qu’EDF se traîne actuellement, c’est surtout le bouclier tarifaire suite à l’augmentation vertigineuse des prix au début de la guerre en Ukraine + le fonctionnement du marché européen + l’ARENH, tout ça pendant qu’EDF a vu sa production chuter à cause des corrosions sur les réacteurs nucléaires.
En gros, EDF a moins produit, a dû acheter de l’électricité absolument hors de prix à ses voisins, a dû revendre à ~40€/MWh le quart de l’électricité qu’il achetait à 10 fois ce prix, et l’État leur a dit de ne pas augmenter les prix. Donc ils ont dû s’endetter.