

It is possible that any developer could just say “none” even if the extension does collect data? If it has to be manually disclosed, this won’t stop malicious actors. Only trustworthy extension developers would disclose this.


It is possible that any developer could just say “none” even if the extension does collect data? If it has to be manually disclosed, this won’t stop malicious actors. Only trustworthy extension developers would disclose this.


Just discovered TinyAuth and it is fantastic. I am replacing Authentik with it because it has what I want but is much faster, smaller, and simpler. Also, the license is FOSS.


You don’t need DHCP, you can just use DNS and then set up different blocking groups based on the device.
The problem with this solution is that is it opt in. You would need to change all the wifi settings on each device separately to point to Pi-Hole as the DNS. This is something that could easily be disabled as a 12 year old would probably be able to figure out how to change the settings on their mobile devices or computer with a Google search.
I don’t know of any comprehensive source but there are a few basic things you that I do.


PyLoad isn’t a container I run 24/7 because the use cases are a bit limited. Basically, if I have a large list of files that I want to pass to my NAS (perhaps a list from something like DownThemAll) that won’t complete in a short sitting, I will pass that list to PyLoad so it can just run the background.
I once downloaded about 2,000 or so office files and tools like this have let me do that automatically.


Why did they need to tear it apart to discover the advantage was government funding? It this just a click bait headline?