That’s a good observation. The thumbnail is indeed updated and at a higher res at https://toast.ooo/post/4077161 compared to lemmy.world for example.
Moved to lemmy.zip. May not respond here timely.
- 2 Posts
- 20 Comments
Is the thumbnail version going to be the final official version? It’s from hours before the end.
I preferred being able to interact with the canvas even with the settings menu open. This allows for quick transparency adjustments without having to go back and forth every time.
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Apple Terminated Epic’s Developer AccountEnglish6·1 year agoIn countries like Georgia and Syria, the minimum annual wage is below $100.
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightEnglish1·2 years agoThey invested in Godot, Lutris, and SDL.
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightEnglish3·2 years agoI don’t think Epic ask that Fortnite is on any store but their own. They want their fully capable launcher on the dominant store.
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightEnglish14·2 years agoThis was a jury trial.
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightEnglish32·2 years agoGoogle made the same argument in this case, but Epic responded by saying that impairing the competition is sufficient to describe the behavior as unlawful. Like Google, Valve control the vast majority of the market, charge a fee that is way above the cost of service, and have rules that make the competitors less appealing. Like this one:
In response to one inquiry from a game publisher, in another example, Valve explained: “We basically see any selling of the game on PC, Steam key or not, as a part of the same shared PC market- so even if you weren’t using Steam keys, we’d just choose to stop selling a game if it was always running discounts of 75% off on one store but 50% off on ours. . . .”
(source)
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightEnglish5·2 years agoIf Epic aren’t suing for damages I don’t really see what the goal could be
As reported by The Verge,
Epic says it’s asking for three things: freedom for Epic and other developers to introduce their own stores without restriction, total freedom to use its own billing system, and an anti-circumvention provision “just to be sure Google can’t reintroduce the same problems through some alternative creative solution.”
Judge Donato says the last won’t happen: “We don’t do don’t- break-the-law injunctions… if you have a problem, you can come back.”
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightEnglish21·2 years ago“Impairment means something is there, it’s being used, it just isn’t as good. Prevented means you shut it down.”
Epic’s expert Bernheim argues that Google’s expert Gentzkow “ignores four critical aspects of Google’s conduct,” including:
-
Google impairs competition without preventing it entirely
-
Google’s conduct targets comeptition as it emerges
-
Google is dominant
-
Google shares its Play profits with its competitors
“When push came to shove, he talked about whether competition is prevented” rather than impaired, says Bernheim.
The upshot of that: Bernheim believes Epic doesn’t need to prove Google actually blocked competition entirely. In his opinion (for Epic), Epic only needs to show there were no good alternatives to Google Play and Google Play Billing. It doesn’t need to show there were no alternatives at all.
For example, says Bernheim, Gentzkow presented a chart titled “Was Fortnite Blocked?” showing that revenue tanked on Google Play after the app was kicked off the store, but didn’t tank for Android phones that got Fortnite a different way.
But “If off-Google Play was a good substitute for Google Play, you’d see when one drops, the other goes up commensurably.” That didn’t happen: demand stayed stable outside of Play, according to the bar graph we just saw. “There’s no indication that any of the people here are substituting to off-Google Play.”
-
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightEnglish41·2 years agoThat’s just two options from two big players who cooperate, and only on some devices.
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightEnglish1·2 years agodeleted by creator
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightEnglish21·2 years agoThe jury settled on the relevant geographic market being “worldwide excluding China”.
Rose@lemmy.worldto Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Russia Blocks 167 VPNs, Steps Up OpenVPN and WireGuard DisruptionEnglish131·2 years agoThey won’t. For most of its history, Russia has been ruled by dictators. Democracy is viewed as chaotic and unpredictable.
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•About half of Bandcamp employees have been laid offEnglish1·2 years agodeleted by creator
Rose@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Microsoft Defender Flags Tor Browser as a Trojan and Removes it from the System - DeformEnglish92·2 years agoIt’s defensible only from the perspective that it’s safer to flag many innocent apps than to miss something harmful. That said, it heavily punishes many legitimate developers and creators, as documented here. I was personally affected on many occasions and there hasn’t been a single one where Microsoft wouldn’t admit to false-flagging upon a manual review.
To be fair, our work was heavily griefed by a user running 6 accounts, then almost erased by a moderator before they changed their mind. Then there was more trolling and fighting in two places. Other than that, it was fun and significantly less chaotic than r/place.
Fair enough, but you were also personally aware of my post pointing out the issue, while @Gurkinator@toast.ooo sent me a message saying they’d check the logs in connection to this again, to which I replied by sending the account names in a PM.
I’ll PM you excerpts from the log that are quite conclusive about it being extremely likely to be the same person based on their activity. Hopefully it will help you be more prepared for something like this in the future.
Banned and unbanned and still here!
What is the proper way to tie multiple artworks to one entry? I think that was possible on the original Atlas. Here it seems that even duplicate names are not allowed, so documenting many instances of one thing (e.g. the Ukrainian flags) isn’t straightforward.