Wasn’t this obvious? He didn’t need to go “all-in on ai” cause there is hundreds of thousands of people who tried the same thing already and everyone of them could tell him that’s not what ai can do.

Come on, nobody is going to eliminate poverty. That’s not on the agenda.

Plus we don’t even have a road how to make robots that could make other robots.

They will be fine. They are second most valuable company in the world. They have money to throw around and their source of income still seem inexhaustible. A few new Linux users won’t even make a dent.

Sorry to be so blunt, but it’s the truth no matter what we are wishing for.

Yeah, that’s true I guess. I’m using ai from protona lot for my complicated medical conditions and it’s helpful, still would be better to have it local. Especially if it had good features.

A friend of mine is building something like that. You scan all the documents and you can set reminders, it does summaries and proposes actions and a buck of other really neat stuff It’s ai. I think it’s a good use case. But the ai means it has to call a server with the information, so I can’t get past that.

Id still want to double check😀.

When I first got internet in 95, it was easy to find stuff like that. I even made a website about making explosives for my computer class. Got a good grade for it and everything. Nobody said anything. Kind of weird if I think of it now. Anyway, making explosives as a hobby is a real bad decision. Most people understand that. The ones that don’t are not smart enough to make them. The ones that are smart enough and still want to make them, would not use chatgpt.

Yes, that’s all great, but you have completely the wrong assumptions about me and about what I said.

Nevertheless I appreciate that you gathered all that information together.

Whatever you say boss.

That’s great, but nothing to do with what I’m saying.

I am thinking of the political effects. I’m surprised that there doesn’t seem to be any after what they did to her and others on the boats.

But on the other hand, the world has stood by for more than half a century of torture of Gazans, so it shouldn’t be surprising.

We have also not abandoned many systems many times, that’s not an argument. Show me the effect and disruption. I’m not against it, just right now there isn’t much there.

You can say she was the head of that flotilla and without her it would be at least much smaller and you are right, but in this case, considering what Israel did to them and there is still a lack of any real effects.

Your teach? Wow. I thought you are a psychic since you know everything about me from one Lemmy post lol.

I hope you aren’t such s duche with you students. Anyway, in any case it makes sense to asses effectiveness every now and then. For academic purposes of nothing else.

Sure. Skill issue. Says the skilled warrior changing the world.

Sure. Whatever you say.

Effective? Come on.

I mean she’s great, gave a voice to what a lot of people have been thinking for decades before she was born. Maybe what most people think today. But there is really nothing that’s effective. It’s not dissing her, it’s just that the machine is too strong and it’s able to even use the opposition to itself for the machines purpose, like the article says.Usually. It didn’t work with Greta, so she’s just ignored.

I think we can speculate with a high degree of confidence that it won’t influence their profit growth projections.

That’s not what you are doing at all. You are not laughing. Anti ai people are outraged, full of hatred and ready to pounce on anyone who isn’t as anti as they are. It’s a super emotional issue, especially on fediverse.

You may be confident, because you probably don’t know how software is built. Nobody is going to just abandon all the experience they have, vibe code something and release whatever. Thats not how it works.

I think people today, after having a year experience with ai know it’s capabilities reasonably well. My mother is 73 and it’s been a while since she stopped joking about what ai wrote to her that was silly or wrong, so people using computers at their jobs should be much more aware.

I agree about that llms are good at some things. They are great tools for what they can do. Let’s use them for those things! I mean even programming has benefitted a lot from this, especially in education, junior level stuff, prototyping, …

When using any product, a certain responsibility falls on the user. You can’t blame technology for what stupid users do.

Ok? So, what you are saying is that some lawyers are idiots. I could have told you that before ai existed.

No not really, just an observation. It literally said you are a boring person. Not sure whats not to get.

Bye.