Are you a librarian?

I mean, you still need it, the phone has to be on and connected to the same wifi as whatever it’s casting to.

Believe it or not, prolonged physical and mental torture is not speech, a religion, a function of the press, an assembly, or a petition. You could probably get some of the physical violence covered by the Second Amendment though, if you have a gun and just do a little of the South Park “he’s coming right for us” thing.

Given all the possible context, I still don’t see the headline as misleading 🤷‍♂️ idk what to tell y’all. Typically “breaking” news headlines are written in present tense “Trump threatens…”, so any headline that starts “Trump threatened…” I just automatically assume to have happened sometime in the last 10 or 15 years, while bearing at least a semblance of relevance to current events. Like this one. It’s definitely a nothingstory, but it doesn’t read to me as a decrease in journalistic quality.

You very conveniently left out the “But taking him at his word” part of my comment, which kind of negates everything you’re complaining about. See, that’s a good example of taking a quote out of context and changing the meaning, unlike this headline. I do agree that we shouldn’t report onanything he says though, just report on the administration’s actions.

If it was so clear, we wouldn’t be having this conversation because I disagree. Like I said, even all that context doesn’t actually give any context because nothing Trump says really has any meaning. When he says something happened “in the past”, it could mean it happened at literally any time previously, it could mean he expects it to happen soon and as such is an inevitability so he just says it already happened, it could mean it never happened and never will. But even taking him at his word, nothing from that “context” makes me any less likely to believe he found out what Nvidia was minutes before taking the stage. And even if he did know what Nvidia was “in the past”, he did try to break it up without knowing what it was, so where’s the contradiction? I don’t see how that headline is implying any kind of timeframe, inaccurate or otherwise.

Trying to put Trump quotes into context is like trying to read a Pollock, it’s not possible and it’s not supposed to be. Your interpretation really didn’t change any of the meaning for me, and it certainly didn’t contradict the headline.

I just hate their app and refuse to use it

Sounds like a plan!

You make it sound like you think he has morals, lol

Additionally, the word is “wary”

I didn’t

Wait, we got a Future Crimes Division? I didn’t know .world was run by a bunch of milky precogs…

Precious Hamburgers?

You’re describing users without basic knowledge.

This is pretty big news, I would think it would be relevant in way more than just one article, time to do some updating.

Working for the FDA sounds like it could be pretty lame until you learn about Laser Division.

I like to think of it like a Mad Cow or Kuru, you can’t eat your own species’s brains or you could get a super lethal, contagious prion disease.

That meme sucked

He knowingly signed bombs, doesn’t really matter to me who’s children it killed, he’s a psychopath.