

I thought onlyfans was the cheap and easy desire “fast-food”-like product for women. Or instagram or whatever social media gives people the impression of being center stage. Not robots.
I thought onlyfans was the cheap and easy desire “fast-food”-like product for women. Or instagram or whatever social media gives people the impression of being center stage. Not robots.
Soo, the point is to not enable features that undermine security, like using an FQDN as a key (or source of a key) and to enable features that reduce DoS, like a connection timeout. Does not sound like bugs, just like missing default options.
It’s still important to not use the affecting options.
Alovoa sounds nice, but I didn’t try it out myself.
Pretty sure humans are animals too
And the responses will be good for the economy!
Don’t work around the limitations!
I think the reason for this implementation is more the theft prevention. This sounds very mich like certificates to me
For the individual saving is something very good. For the economy, however, a money hoarder is dead weight. It’s why inflation won’t ever completely go away, because it discourages hoarding (investing/bringing it to the bank can counteract this, that’s why I didn’t call it saving the second and third time)
It really depends who the issuer of the certificates (wallets) is. The funds get automatically transferred and won’t be lost, it’s “just” a privacy problem (plus the issuer will probably be able to interfere).
So the idea isn’t that dystopian, but it very much depends on the implementation.
I think the idea was that you can’t hoard anything, and stealing or reusing is harder. But it does make the central management way more powerful than it should be. But it’s normal bank standard.
What do you mean with “dystopian statist money”?
Yeah, I think so too. It should replace bank transactions completely.
The netherlands are already looking into it: https://www.ngi.eu/ngi-projects/ngi-taler/
The project could be used via paper trail, as far as I understand it.
In the video you can hear them yelling “Hey! Release the kid!” and stuff like that. They also call the police “murderers” for protecting the child against the thrown stuff, so I don’t really take them seriously.
I haven’t found any statement from the father, or someone adjacent to them, so I don’t know what they have to say about this. Maybe someone can find something.
Source is the police, here is the Link to the news ticker
Here’s the relevant part as a screenshot:
Gegen 18 Uhr wurden Einsatzkräfte auf einen Jungen aufmerksam, der zuvor offenbar ohne Begleitung an der Versammlung teilgenommen hatte. Aufgrund der noch andauernden polizeilichen Maßnahmen im Nachgang der Versammlung wurde der Elfjährige zu seinem eigenen Schutz in Obhut genommen. Sein Vater wurde benachrichtigt, der ihn circa 90 Minuten später abholte.
Translated by me:
At about 6:00 PM officers noticed a boy attending the event clearly unsupervised. Because of police activity after the event the 11-year-old was taken into police protection. His father was notified and he took the boy with him after 90 minutes.
According to the police the kid was being chased and secured for his own safety because he was unsupervised at the event. He was returned to the father.
Yeah, was thinking about joining the room to see what is written. Not what was asked.
But your username and server will be seen and could potentially be noticed by someone you don’t want.
A plugin for yt-dlp will suffice. It’s also easier to maintain.
*without reaching statistically relevant levels of seizure induced deaths.
E-inks with 30+ framerates (and durability of multiple years while doing so) will save us!