Really sucks that there are no other search engines to use.
Probably Gemini told them that would be an awesome Idea.
use duckduckgo then. google search is mostly AI generated anyways now.
This will backfire hard. It will create students who do not conflate Google with search.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is in the middle of making a big mistake.
They seem to be going all-in on bad ideas lately, losing all that ad revenue from ai giving the answers before they can bombard the inquirer with ad slop and now this. Let them die a fiery death, lol
shut off their refrigerators.
Google and Republicans want stupid easy-to-control kids who grow up into stupid easy-to-control adults that can’t think for themselves.
deleted by creator
Great! Let’s teach kids that “searching the internet” does not have to mean “Google it”
I’ve read that young folks have dropped the term and now say “search it”. I’ll have to ask my young ones. Unfortunately, they often answer in ways they think daddy wants to hear, despite my admonitions to stop that shit.
No they fucking say “chatgpt it” 💀
Thems fighting words at my house
DuckDuckGo
You are foolish for not using that by now.
Happy Kagi user here
And yes, DDG is Bing results, we know.
It’s a mix of indexes, Bing has been a minority share for years now.
searxng if youre into self hosting
I tried to self-host unsuccessfully, so I just wanna give a shoutout to whoever hosts priv.au. You’re a real one ✌️
I prefer Qwant. Better results, especially when searching in other languages than English.
Except the results suck, and the results are the entire purpose
Maybe “naïve” or “ill informed”. “Foolish” is pretty harsh.
Foolish is accurate.
Anyone supporting Google, Meta, Musk, Anthropic, Amazon, etc are fools.
The assumption of tech savvy around here is wild! Never been in another online space where people assume everyone is at a reasonable tech level.
You’ve never been on the internet before lemmy?
:) Since the 90s! But nowhere, and I do mean nowhere, is as snotty and assumptive about the man-on-the-street’s tech savvy.
Yeah I’d agree its probably over assumed here more than other places, but it’s definitely not uncommon in other online spaces… I find it hard to believe it’s something you’ve never seen before unless the only other space you’ve been is Instagram or tumblr and only following food posts or similar…
FTFY:
The assumption of tech savvy around here is wild! Never been in another online space where [all the] people [there] assume everyone is at a reasonable tech level.
You get me. I meant it’s worse here than other places. Same for assuming political savvy. Believe it or not, there are shitloads of Americans who don’t know about 1/1000th of Trump’ crimes. “Oh I don’t listen, politics is all bullshit.”
Commented on Trump’s dementia to a friend the other day, “Yeah, but wasn’t Biden pretty bad too?” That’s where the “man on the street” is at. :(
The you in the comment from the top of this thread is addressing the average lemmy user, the man on the street being a fool is nearly a given 😅
I’m gonna forward this article to DuckDuckGo and Kagi. I imagine they could help the school district do what Google can’t.
YaCy for the brave and independent
Good, keep shooting your self.
Schools all across the world are rejecting AI, this will open the road for alternative search engines.Another commenter said that the IT admin would simply change the search engine behind the omnibar. Easy money and nothing really changes except the kids betting better search results.
Kids shouldn’t gamble.
Don’t be Evil…be nice to those quarterly reports.
Search should be a public utility at this point.
But then again I don’t know how you’d neutrally maintain a search algorithm.
Regardless, depending on a private company for something so fundamental to societal functions seems bad.
the way it worked originally, pagerank. SEO, will never cease sadly; goodhart’s law n all, but it’s better than what we have now
You want the government running search?! That’s an absolute horror show; you see the impossibility of neutrality.
Here in Florida, “homosexual teen” would lead to sites about conversion camps. We might just score a Democrat in the governor’s mansion today, so that would change. And then change again. Imagine the non-stop public fight over what is and is not appropriate to show in a search. AH! (I’m actually having a giggle thinking about such fighting. “Trannie” would lead to results about transmissions one year, a transexual slur the next, banned altogether the next.)
At least there would be a non-stop public fight over it, instead of just having to swallow whatever the corpos which captured the government want to put in their search result.
I imagine there’d be even more bribery if search was run by a government.
If search was provided by a government run by a functioning country with strong democratic roots - AKA the west excluding the US - political parties messing with search would cause them to lose voters. Bribery only increases that effect in an actually working structure.
Okay. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out, Google.
