Companies have been very forthcoming with their AI use and development, actually.
And you can tell when it starts getting used. Suddenly the UI will be replaced with the ubiquitous Clod™ look. Then the bugs and awful performance start rearing their head. If you use programs, it’s plainly obvious that the quality of software over the last year has plummeted.
You have no clue what is or isn’t being developed with AI. That’s a fact.
Enjoy the easy dunks if you must, but I would argue that most of the software you use today is being developed alongside AI.
So I can point at any software, and you can tell me whether it’s clean and blessed and pure vs coded with AI?
Meme all you want if that helps you cope
With a reasonable degree of accuracy, in most cases, yes, I can. I have been doing this for damn near 20 years.
I cannot overemphasize how little I care about your opinion or pithy retorts.
You absolutely can not, regardless of how much code you’ve written, period stop.
That’s preposterous, saying you know how any program comes together by looking at it?
That’s delusion
Companies have been very forthcoming with their AI use and development, actually.
And you can tell when it starts getting used. Suddenly the UI will be replaced with the ubiquitous Clod™ look. Then the bugs and awful performance start rearing their head. If you use programs, it’s plainly obvious that the quality of software over the last year has plummeted.
This isn’t alongside though, according to Tim they’re not allowed to write any code themselves
Except they do, because it says so in the article. It even says it in the title of the article if you’re too lazy to open the link
Seems pretty straightforward to me.
Did you miss my point entirely? I mean all software