• P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Then define intelligence.

    You can’t just say a thing is intelligent or not intelligent without coming up with a good definition. We are ugly meatbags of mostly water that are constantly driven by chemical processes. How the hell do you call that intelligent? Prove that we are intelligent, and then prove that the “algorithmic iterator”, that uses weighted metrics with an eerie similarity to neurons, isn’t actually intelligent.

    • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intelligence

      I know you’re not a fan of the dictionary, but they are the authority on words and their meanings.

      Before you get too excited about definition 3 I suggest you familiarize yourself with what it means to “compute” https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/compute you’ll notice repeated use of the word “determine”. LLMs are by nature “non-deterministic” or in other words “incapable of determining / incapable of making a determination”.

      A computer is deterministic

      An LLM is a probabilistic next-word-guessing machine / software as a service

      • Darkaga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Your analysis of definition 3 also precludes the human mind as being capable of computation since biological systems contain inherent randomness that makes their output non deterministic.