Age verification proposals are often presented as a simple tradeoff: sacrifice a little privacy to better safeguard children online. But that framing overlooks a more fundamental question. What happens to people who cannot verify their age at all? This is particularly a problem when users are required to prove their age with identity documents.

              • StabbingSky@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                You do realize that a significant amount of laws that apply to the population don’t apply to politicians and the ultra wealthy, right?

                It’s currently one of the biggest societal issues on the planet.

                • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The point of this comment thread is not about who can get away with it. That’s not up for debate.

                  The only point I have made is: the wealthy have no more power to hide their online activities than you or I do

                  • StabbingSky@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Yes, it is. The statement was that they would be beholden to the same age verification requirements that we would.

                    What people have been trying to tell you is that your assumption isn’t backed by precedent.

            • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m not debating a straw man argument

              It’s not about “getting away with it” - my point is I can mask my online activity as well or better than anyone with endless funds

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                my point is I can mask my online activity as well or better than anyone with endless funds

                For now. But we’re not talking about the status quo; we’re talking about a future with comprehensive age verification schemes that render all your current masking tactics impossible or illegal.

                • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I’m talking about today. Illegality has no bearing on possibility, which is the only point I have argued for

      • Cheebus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        billionaires don’t even pay taxes lol

        this is and always will be “rules for thee but not for me” type shit