• Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yet all major players are still incapable of covering their costs and have to resort to all sorts of nasty accounting tricks to make it apear otherwise. How so?

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because of the massive investments into datacenters. Why is everyone so quick to drink the kool-aid. They are spending stupid amounts of money to capture the market and force everyone into a subscription service, not because it cost money to actually run the models. They are all switching their models to fine tuned quants after the first two weeks as well.

      The open source community has found dozens of ways to lower costs, do you really think these big companies aren’t using the same tricks and haven’t developed even more advanced techniques?

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        It doesn’t matter what tricks they supposedly use afterwards, the data centets that are built need to run successfully or the bubble pops and then those companies will fall like lead. In other words for those data centers to be successfull the entire real economy has to spend crazy amounts of money on stuff that needs crazy amounts of compute.

        Open AI and Anthropic would really need some good business numbers, right now. The claim that they are just deliberately making their business case much worse than it is, is insane.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The inference cost doesn’t actually drop in reality.

          My comment was about this which is just completely wrong.

          OpenAI is the scummiest company on earth but everyone is ready to believe them when they say shit like "our 20$ plan lets you run up the equivalent of a billion dollars in API fees. Giggles. It’s a good plan for you but not for us ;) "

          The main thing bringing up costs is stuff like Sam Altman spending all the “inference” money on raw wafers just to strangle consumer GPU sales.

          It’s not a good business model because of how cheap inference actually is. Once you have open models and the moat is broken, the only thing left to do is regulatory capture, upping the demand for the hardware and little charades like these.