• AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    17% surveyed said they paid for their own AI tools.

    Extrapolating that to the size of the UK workforce, that’s around 5-6 million people.

    That’s ~£166-200 per person per year, which is less than the premium ChatGPT or Claude plans, but more than the entry-level paid plans. That passes the sniff test, though I still find it kind of hard to believe.

    What I really want to know is how much person-time are these people indirectly wasting with sloppy work? Because I absolutely do not believe that many people can use AI effectively. I’ve seen too much to believe that. How much of this is just morging?

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      I wasn’t really disputing the numbers per se (although I do actually find it hard to believe 17% of workers pay for AI subscriptions…) but more wondering about, given that their combined revenues are somewhere around 50 billion USD, what the consequences of such a large fraction of that coming from heavily subsidised consumer use would be.