• SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    You know, nobody is forcing these people to do all of this. Nobody is holding them hostage and telling them to be the worst person that ever lived. At any point, they could just stop to do whatever they try to do.

    But no, they decided this is the way our society and civilization has to be run. And we still stand by and watch in disgust.

    • PushButton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There is a train race. Just like car racers, you have train racers putting coal in the engine, pushing the machine forward the finish line.

      At one point, a few racers are saying that they are moving at incredible speed and everything is “so hot”.

      As any train, you own the speed, not the track! At one point, a racer might say that the current speed is too fast if a sharp curve is coming, but that he cannot stop putting coal in the engine because slowing down might cost him the race…

      That’s what is happening.

      N.B. I don’t agree with AI LLM and all that, I am trying to explain as best as I could.

      See the Skeleton sport too…

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It is so bizarre to me that the idea of AI being something that will end the human race is now an integral part of these guy’s marketing strategies.

    As a human myself, I wouldn’t wanna invest in something that’s meant to destroy humans but to each their own.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I heard an interview recently with Emile Torres about this. And he didn’t make this any less stupid, but he did a great job helping to explain the deranged pathologies of the people behind these.

      When you have the power to make decisions at a global scale, your goals and fears are radically different from those of people who only have the ability to make choices that impact their household or family or neighborhood.

      These people have a fantasy of being not just A “great man of history” but THE greatest, most important, most monumental figure to have ever lived in the whole universe. And in their head, if this technology either allows humans to make a superior species that replaces us and goes on to conquer the whole galaxy or just eradicates all the life on the only habitable planet we know of… well what a legacy, you know? There’s no bigger tombstone that says ‘I MATTERED!’

      And that’s what they crave. They’re basically sick, poisoned with toxic levels of power and ego.

    • tmyakal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Literally, their pitches have amounted to, “We’re going to create massive unemployment” and “we’re going to kill everyone.” And they’re absolutely shocked that the public opinion is against them?

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        America had to build the (atom) bomb to “beat the Russians to it”. Then the h-bomb, then the ICBM. Every time it was “we, the good guys need this first to save the world”.

        Except, even ignoring the “good guys” part, its always easier to copy and steal than build something new from scratch. In every case, America just ended up handing the tech to Russia. You dont slow down tech by inventing it first.

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It is part of the grift. Anthropic and OpenAI want to go public and a huge part of their cash burn is compute expense for training new models. (In public filings they claim they are profitable … if you look at their numbers that’s only if you remove their biggest expense which is model training) At the same time they are seeing fewer gains with new frontier models. Some are also claiming the new models aren’t as good as the ones from a year ago and you are loosing your market advantage with frontier models?

    What do you do if your largest expense is generating fewer gains and you want to go public? Get the government to regulate it and build a regulatory mote around your industry and freeze your advantage over your competitors while you have it. Cut that expense and go public as a profitable company!

    At this point I only want to see regulations well after the AI bubble pops. Don’t take any government stakes in these AI companies as Bernie has argued for (I agree with his stances on most economic matters but he’s off base with this). Let these AI companies burn in the free market they advocate for soo much.

  • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I wish the press would get into the habit of interpreting ‘rogue agent’ as ‘we can’t sandbox our potential malware for toffee’.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    14 hours ago

    At this point, the human extinction is an enthusiastically advertised feature and not a bug.

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The most bizarre part is that it’s false advertising that investors and enthusiasts eat up.

        • DjangoFett@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s generous to Republicans; Anthropic et al have their hands so far up conservative asses they can all smell their own shit from the inside.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They are pulling back because their hype about extinction didn’t pan out and they need the excuse. No, it’s for the good of humanity, not that the tech doesn’t work as hyped. Because these ceo’s and politicians definitely give a fuck about human extinction. /s

  • _deleted_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The word prediction software can’t think and can’t reason. Maybe they should fix the bugs in their software before trying to raise money to make it bigger?

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      LLM’s can’t be fixed as such. The hallucinations won’t stop, because the tech is not AI. It can do a lot of things, like create secret social scores on us based on everything we do to be used secretly against us under half baked metrics and dishonest implementation of those metrics to punish the enemies of the authorities.