Seeing Blackbird fly again after all these years would be incredible. I’d love to know what NASA has planned for it.

  • skibidi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Any country involved in a shooting war is within their rights to shoot at any object they have reason to believe is a military target, regardless of where that object is.

    Outside their airspace, in international waters, inside another country, on the fucking Moon - the limits are technological, not legal.

    If the object isn’t a military target, then they aren’t within their rights to shoot at it no matter where it is. Not that that has stopped attacks on civilians in the past (e.g. Russian ballistic missile attacks on apartment blocks, US drone strikes of fishing boats), only that the laws of war forbid such things.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Didn’t you hear? The war is over. We “won”…… TACO sez, “ I didn’t say it, I declared it”

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I chuckled the other day when I heard that the planned attack on the UK airbase used by the US for attacks on Iran, is being blamed on Iran, and also being called terrorism.

      I don’t think it’s terrorism when it’s a legitimate military target that takes place during war time. While it is possible for terrorism to exist during a war (you know, something like bombing schools, hospitals, residences, etc), an attack on an enemy’s base doesn’t fit.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        All the Arab countries condemning Iran for attacking US bases and US military personnel conducting the war on Iran from their land is just as comical.