cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/36071801

This author trieds hard to do a pragmatic view. He does not mention ethical or ecological concerns (which should matter far more and subject to legal regulation IMO).

Instead, he focuses on the quality topic. His thinking is that companies are doing now a kind of quality arbitrage: Companies can make low-quality code at far cheaper costs, and sellthe result still at human-made prices. Which will only work for so long, he thinks: Customers will demand lower prices. (Easy to imagine a quality downward spiral.)

Which invokes the question: What has happened that people accept lower and lower quality? Is new software nowadays still really useful?

  • mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    DHHs takes are hilarious lately. This is one of the things he was saying recently. How coding is solved. Lol.

    • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      DHH is a racist fuck who’s picked by Big AI to play the bad cop. Don’t know why CS community can’t pull a Morrisey to him and keep him relevant.