• Trilogy3452@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not only about sending data, it’s also the fact that they’re allowed to record without it being obvious. It needs to be unmistakable when it’s recording

      • Trilogy3452@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Phones - usually obvious but not obvious enough, so yes I am for making a big red undeniable record indicator. Cameras - they either show footage or take footage, so easier to understand. Security cameras - they usually put up a sign when you’re entering a recorded zone, yeah we should make it obvious.

        Pre internet it was not interconnected, having it so easy to connect data gives too much power over people’s lives. That makes the problem worse, but giving you a choice to chopse what you do and say when recorded is crucial in my opinion

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Why does it need to be obvious?

      In the US, everyone has the right to record what’s happening in public. Private settings are different, of course.

      I know we’re talking about Europe here but I’m genuinely curious how it improves things to make it “obvious” other than annoying legitimate users and doing nothing at all to people who actually want to record people in secret.

      Basically, it sounds like the pointless cookie warnings all over again.

      • corey931@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Not everybody is fine with having their face be recorded and get put in a Meta ad or put on PornHub etc. If you know you’re being recorded, you can hold them liable

        • Riskable@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Again, you’re assuming that the only thing with glasses and a camera that can exist will be sold and operated by Meta. This is not the case.

          The only reason why there’s not much competition yet is the expense. Meta can sell the glasses at a discount because the wearer (and everyone/everything they look at) is what they’re actually selling.

          Eventually there will be glasses running regular Linux that people can do with as they please. Then the real innovation will happen.

      • Trilogy3452@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because then you get a chance to control your image. It’s a reminder that you’re being recorded, assuming you’re always recorded isn’t practical. You’re also at that point have the right to express your annoyance, perverts for example will get shamed immediately and in public.

        Forcing manufacturers too will help curb illegal recording in private places (offenders will have to work harder to hide the fact that they’re recording)