@bekkaboo@girlcock.club Linux itself is heavily using AI models. Therefore, every Linux distribution moving to recent kernel versions is heavily built on top of using AI models. Creating a Linux distribution not heavily using it would require a hard fork of the Linux kernel and many other projects.
It's unclear what would be accomplished by banning AI for a tiny portion of the code while continuing to use Linux, AOSP, Chromium and hundreds of other projects heavily using it. We'd still be benefiting from it.
GrapheneOS is currently defending its use of AI coding tools on Mastodon against complaints by various accounts claiming to be users.
We do not understand where you’re coming from or why you’re so incredibly angry with us. It’s not justified and does not make sense.
The objections of many are not focused on whether or not it is useful, they are about whether or not it is ethical to use.
Many object to the fact that it was trained on the works of others with no renumeration or accreditation. Others have objections to its resource efficiency compared with traditional methods. Still others have concerns about the long-term health of codebases written with it. I’m sure quite a few have all three objections.
These are all concerns that will need to be overcome before this technology will stop being controversial and many refuse to touch it or anything it has touched.
The objections of many are not focused on whether or not it is useful, they are about whether or not it is ethical to use.
Many object to the fact that it was trained on the works of others with no renumeration or accreditation. Others have objections to its resource efficiency compared with traditional methods. Still others have concerns about the long-term health of codebases written with it. I’m sure quite a few have all three objections.
These are all concerns that will need to be overcome before this technology will stop being controversial and many refuse to touch it or anything it has touched.
I feel ya dude